Canara Bank br. Samarth Through Sumit Bhimrao Govaradhan vs Kesharbai Sheshrao raut — 37/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Uo34. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 16th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN040015232025
e-Filing Number
07-05-2025
Filing Number
482/2025
Filing Date
01-Jul-2025
Registration No
37/2025
Registration Date
01-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
14-Civil Judge Senior Division
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Canara Bank br. Samarth Through Sumit Bhimrao Govaradhan
Adv. JHA ANAND NARAYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kesharbai Sheshrao raut
-
2.Narayan Kondiba Budhnar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: The Civil Judge at Ambad decreed Canara Bank's suit against farmer borrower Kesharbai Raut and guarantor Narayan Budhnar for recovery of Rs. 14,97,571. The defendants had defaulted on a Rs. 3,00,000 agricultural loan sanctioned in 2014, which became a non-performing asset in 2016. The court found the defendants liable based on unchallenged bank evidence, as they failed to appear or defend the case; however, the court reduced the claimed interest from 10.45% to 9% p.a., finding the bank's claim excessive, payable within six months of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
04-Oct-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
15-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2025
Case Summary: The Civil Judge at Ambad decreed Canara Bank's suit against farmer borrower Kesharbai Raut and guarantor Narayan Budhnar for recovery of Rs. 14,97,571. The defendants had defaulted on a Rs. 3,00,000 agricultural loan sanctioned in 2014, which became a non-performing asset in 2016. The court found the defendants liable based on unchallenged bank evidence, as they failed to appear or defend the case; however, the court reduced the claimed interest from 10.45% to 9% p.a., finding the bank's claim excessive, payable within six months of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts