Manda Natha Dhule vs Sudam Rupsing Rathod Advocate - KHEDKAR M.G. — 145/2024
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section order. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN040013912024
Next Hearing
23rd July 2026
e-Filing Number
20-06-2024
Filing Number
572/2024
Filing Date
26-06-2024
Registration No
145/2024
Registration Date
26-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
9-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manda Natha Dhule
Adv. BHAWALE SATISH RAMRAO
Respondent(s)
Sudam Rupsing Rathod Advocate - KHEDKAR M.G.
Shankarlal Salkram Somani
Anilkumar Salkram Somani
Jodhu Rupa Chavan
Sheshrao Rambhau Kalbande
Prabhakar Rambhau Kalbande
Laxman Rambhau Kalbande
Hearing History
Judge: 9-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 15-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 14-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 15-01-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Case 145/2024 Outcome: The petition filed by Manda Natha Dhule is ALLOWED. An interim injunction order has been granted in favor of the petitioner/plaintiff, restraining the respondents from transferring or encumbering the disputed agricultural land (located in Gat No. 369 and Gat No. 96, Ambad, Jalna District). Additionally, the respondents are prohibited from withdrawing compensation amounts for the land that was acquired for the Pazhur Dam project. Costs regarding the petition have been reserved for final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Case 145/2024 Outcome: The petition filed by Manda Natha Dhule is ALLOWED. An interim injunction order has been granted in favor of the petitioner/plaintiff, restraining the respondents from transferring or encumbering the disputed agricultural land (located in Gat No. 369 and Gat No. 96, Ambad, Jalna District). Additionally, the respondents are prohibited from withdrawing compensation amounts for the land that was acquired for the Pazhur Dam project. Costs regarding the petition have been reserved for final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts