Police Station, Gondi (285 BNS) vs Ayyub Pashamiya Shaikh — 323/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN040012072025
Filing Number
816/2025
Filing Date
28-05-2025
Registration No
323/2025
Registration Date
28-05-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
168
Police Station
Ambad
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Police Station, Gondi (285 BNS)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ayyub Pashamiya Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 13-12-2025 | Appearance |
| 01-10-2025 | Appearance |
| 02-08-2025 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 323/2025 - Police Station Gondi v. Ayyub Pashamiya Shaikh The Lok Adalat Panel Court found the defendant, Ayyub Pashamiya Shaikh (age 46), guilty under IPC Section 285 for negligently parking a three-wheeler (MH 21 M 3053) in an unsafe manner at a public location on 15/05/2025, obstructing traffic and endangering public safety. The defendant voluntarily admitted to the charge before the court. Considering the defendant's poor financial circumstances and family dependency on his income, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of ₹300 or two days simple imprisonment in default, as per CrPC Section 275. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 323/2025 - Police Station Gondi v. Ayyub Pashamiya Shaikh The Lok Adalat Panel Court found the defendant, Ayyub Pashamiya Shaikh (age 46), guilty under IPC Section 285 for negligently parking a three-wheeler (MH 21 M 3053) in an unsafe manner at a public location on 15/05/2025, obstructing traffic and endangering public safety. The defendant voluntarily admitted to the charge before the court. Considering the defendant's poor financial circumstances and family dependency on his income, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of ₹300 or two days simple imprisonment in default, as per CrPC Section 275. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts