Shakil Salim Shaikh (503 BNSS) vs State of Maharashta through Police Station Ambad — 61/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN040005622026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
343/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
61/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakil Salim Shaikh (503 BNSS)
Adv. Shrikant Annasaheb Kalbande
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashta through Police Station Ambad
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shakil Salim Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. 61/2026) The court allowed Shakil Salim Shaikh's application for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki Swift Dzire vehicle under BNSS Section 503. The applicant established ownership through valid documents (RC, insurance, driving license, Aadhaar). Though police objected citing evidence preservation and risk of tampering, the court found that the vehicle had already been inspected by RTO and was no longer required for investigation. The court released the vehicle to the applicant on a ₹9 lakh bond with conditions: produce vehicle when directed, maintain it without sale/transfer, prohibit illegal use, and document handover through detailed panchnama and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shakil Salim Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. 61/2026) The court allowed Shakil Salim Shaikh's application for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki Swift Dzire vehicle under BNSS Section 503. The applicant established ownership through valid documents (RC, insurance, driving license, Aadhaar). Though police objected citing evidence preservation and risk of tampering, the court found that the vehicle had already been inspected by RTO and was no longer required for investigation. The court released the vehicle to the applicant on a ₹9 lakh bond with conditions: produce vehicle when directed, maintain it without sale/transfer, prohibit illegal use, and document handover through detailed panchnama and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts