Shakil Salim Shaikh (503 BNSS) vs State of Maharashta through Police Station Ambad — 61/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN040005622026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

343/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad

Judge

6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Shakil Salim Shaikh (503 BNSS)

Adv. Shrikant Annasaheb Kalbande

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashta through Police Station Ambad

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Shakil Salim Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. 61/2026) The court allowed Shakil Salim Shaikh's application for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki Swift Dzire vehicle under BNSS Section 503. The applicant established ownership through valid documents (RC, insurance, driving license, Aadhaar). Though police objected citing evidence preservation and risk of tampering, the court found that the vehicle had already been inspected by RTO and was no longer required for investigation. The court released the vehicle to the applicant on a ₹9 lakh bond with conditions: produce vehicle when directed, maintain it without sale/transfer, prohibit illegal use, and document handover through detailed panchnama and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shakil Salim Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. 61/2026) The court allowed Shakil Salim Shaikh's application for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki Swift Dzire vehicle under BNSS Section 503. The applicant established ownership through valid documents (RC, insurance, driving license, Aadhaar). Though police objected citing evidence preservation and risk of tampering, the court found that the vehicle had already been inspected by RTO and was no longer required for investigation. The court released the vehicle to the applicant on a ₹9 lakh bond with conditions: produce vehicle when directed, maintain it without sale/transfer, prohibit illegal use, and document handover through detailed panchnama and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case