Devidas Punjaji Tayde (503 BNSS) vs Police Station, Ambad — 60/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN040005562026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

337/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

60/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad

Judge

9-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

Ambad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Devidas Punjaji Tayde (503 BNSS)

Adv. PAWSE RAJENDRA DATTATRAY

Respondent(s)

Police Station, Ambad

Hearing History

Judge: 9-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC

09-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Order on Exh

06-04-2026

Order on Exh

04-04-2026

Order on Exh

01-04-2026

Order on Exh

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 60/2026 Summary The court rejected Devidas Punjaji Tayde's application for interim custody of 17 seized bulls, finding prima facie evidence of animal cruelty. The bulls were transported in a closed container with mouths and legs tied, overcrowded, without fodder, water, or veterinary certificates—violating Transport of Animals Rules. The court held that mere ownership claims cannot override animal welfare laws when statutory violations are established, and that the Gaushala is better equipped to provide care pending trial. The applicant must pay ₹200 per animal daily for maintenance costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 60/2026 Summary The court rejected Devidas Punjaji Tayde's application for interim custody of 17 seized bulls, finding prima facie evidence of animal cruelty. The bulls were transported in a closed container with mouths and legs tied, overcrowded, without fodder, water, or veterinary certificates—violating Transport of Animals Rules. The court held that mere ownership claims cannot override animal welfare laws when statutory violations are established, and that the Gaushala is better equipped to provide care pending trial. The applicant must pay ₹200 per animal daily for maintenance costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case