Devidas Punjaji Tayde (503 BNSS) vs Police Station, Ambad — 60/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN040005562026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
337/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
60/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
9-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
123
Police Station
Ambad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devidas Punjaji Tayde (503 BNSS)
Adv. PAWSE RAJENDRA DATTATRAY
Respondent(s)
Police Station, Ambad
Hearing History
Judge: 9-3rd Jt CJJD and JMFC
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 01-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 60/2026 Summary The court rejected Devidas Punjaji Tayde's application for interim custody of 17 seized bulls, finding prima facie evidence of animal cruelty. The bulls were transported in a closed container with mouths and legs tied, overcrowded, without fodder, water, or veterinary certificates—violating Transport of Animals Rules. The court held that mere ownership claims cannot override animal welfare laws when statutory violations are established, and that the Gaushala is better equipped to provide care pending trial. The applicant must pay ₹200 per animal daily for maintenance costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 60/2026 Summary The court rejected Devidas Punjaji Tayde's application for interim custody of 17 seized bulls, finding prima facie evidence of animal cruelty. The bulls were transported in a closed container with mouths and legs tied, overcrowded, without fodder, water, or veterinary certificates—violating Transport of Animals Rules. The court held that mere ownership claims cannot override animal welfare laws when statutory violations are established, and that the Gaushala is better equipped to provide care pending trial. The applicant must pay ₹200 per animal daily for maintenance costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts