shaikh Nashir shaikh najir kureshi vs Police Station, Ambad — 52/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN040005082026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

299/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad

Judge

6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

shaikh Nashir shaikh najir kureshi

Adv. KHARAT VASANT BHAURAO

Respondent(s)

Police Station, Ambad

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD

23-03-2026

Disposed

20-03-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

10-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

07-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Shaikh Nasir v. Police Station, Ambad (Cri.M.A. No. 52/2026) The court rejected the petitioner's application for interim custody of a seized truck used to transport 27 bulls in violation of Transport of Animals Rules. The court found prima facie evidence that the vehicle's transportation method violated mandatory animal welfare provisions regarding space, ventilation, and overcrowding prohibitions. Reasoning that releasing the vehicle posed a reasonable apprehension of repeated illegal animal transportation and evidence tampering, the court upheld seizure to protect animal welfare statutory objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shaikh Nasir v. Police Station, Ambad (Cri.M.A. No. 52/2026) The court rejected the petitioner's application for interim custody of a seized truck used to transport 27 bulls in violation of Transport of Animals Rules. The court found prima facie evidence that the vehicle's transportation method violated mandatory animal welfare provisions regarding space, ventilation, and overcrowding prohibitions. Reasoning that releasing the vehicle posed a reasonable apprehension of repeated illegal animal transportation and evidence tampering, the court upheld seizure to protect animal welfare statutory objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case