shaikh Nashir shaikh najir kureshi vs Police Station, Ambad — 52/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN040005082026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
299/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
52/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
shaikh Nashir shaikh najir kureshi
Adv. KHARAT VASANT BHAURAO
Respondent(s)
Police Station, Ambad
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Disposed
Order
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 10-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 07-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shaikh Nasir v. Police Station, Ambad (Cri.M.A. No. 52/2026) The court rejected the petitioner's application for interim custody of a seized truck used to transport 27 bulls in violation of Transport of Animals Rules. The court found prima facie evidence that the vehicle's transportation method violated mandatory animal welfare provisions regarding space, ventilation, and overcrowding prohibitions. Reasoning that releasing the vehicle posed a reasonable apprehension of repeated illegal animal transportation and evidence tampering, the court upheld seizure to protect animal welfare statutory objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shaikh Nasir v. Police Station, Ambad (Cri.M.A. No. 52/2026) The court rejected the petitioner's application for interim custody of a seized truck used to transport 27 bulls in violation of Transport of Animals Rules. The court found prima facie evidence that the vehicle's transportation method violated mandatory animal welfare provisions regarding space, ventilation, and overcrowding prohibitions. Reasoning that releasing the vehicle posed a reasonable apprehension of repeated illegal animal transportation and evidence tampering, the court upheld seizure to protect animal welfare statutory objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts