The State of Maharashtra vs Jagan Sakharam Natekar Advocate - SATKAR K.S. — 1391/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354(a),504,506. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN030047252021

Filing Number

4725/2021

Filing Date

22-Nov-2021

Registration No

1391/2021

Registration Date

22-Nov-2021

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

747

Police Station

Sadar Bazar Jalna.

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354(a),504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jagan Sakharam Natekar Advocate - SATKAR K.S.

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 13-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: RCC 1391/2021 This criminal case involved the State of Maharashtra versus accused Jagan Sakharam Natekar, represented by advocate K.S. Satkar. The investigation revealed that the accused allegedly assaulted the complainant with intent to cause hurt by grabbing and punching the victim's hand. The prosecution witness (Police Sub-Inspector Mangal Mahadev Sudke) testified regarding the scene inspection, witness statements, and evidence collected. The accused's counsel cross-examined the investigator, contesting certain procedural aspects. The court accepted the witness testimony as recorded. The case proceeded through examination and cross-examination phases, ultimately being disposed of as complete (उलटतपास पूर्ण) on 16.03.2026 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalna. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 06-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 27-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 22-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 30-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 06-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 24-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 28-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 12-May-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 17-Apr-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 24-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 09-Jan-2023

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 11-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 29-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 19-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 26-Apr-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 27-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 22-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 22-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1391/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCC 1391/2021 This criminal case involved the State of Maharashtra versus accused Jagan Sakharam Natekar, represented by advocate K.S. Satkar. The investigation revealed that the accused allegedly assaulted the complainant with intent to cause hurt by grabbing and punching the victim's hand. The prosecution witness (Police Sub-Inspector Mangal Mahadev Sudke) testified regarding the scene inspection, witness statements, and evidence collected. The accused's counsel cross-examined the investigator, contesting certain procedural aspects. The court accepted the witness testimony as recorded. The case proceeded through examination and cross-examination phases, ultimately being disposed of as complete (उलटतपास पूर्ण) on 16.03.2026 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalna. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case