The State of Maharashtra vs Jiga @ Gajaba Pavlasrao Kamble Advocate - SIRSAT G. O. — 636/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 03rd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN030036132018
Filing Number
3610/2018
Filing Date
03-11-2018
Registration No
636/2018
Registration Date
03-11-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
03rd June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
402
Police Station
Sadar Bazar Jalna.
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Jiga @ Gajaba Pavlasrao Kamble Advocate - SIRSAT G. O.
Deepak Kishorsing Thakur(Abated)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District Judge of Jalna acquitted accused Jiga @ Gajaba Pavlasrao Kamble of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, and 504 with section 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that despite the complainant's allegations of assault with a knife and beatings on September 3, 2018, the prosecution could not adequately prove the charges due to insufficient witness testimony and lack of corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District Judge of Jalna acquitted accused Jiga @ Gajaba Pavlasrao Kamble of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, and 504 with section 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that despite the complainant's allegations of assault with a knife and beatings on September 3, 2018, the prosecution could not adequately prove the charges due to insufficient witness testimony and lack of corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts