The State of Maharashtra vs Dr. Nirmal Agrawal Advocate - SOMANI Y G — 300817/2012

Case under Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (prohibition of Sex Selection) Act Section 23,25,26,29. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN030022012012

Case disposed

Filing Number

300817/2012

Filing Date

30-08-2012

Registration No

300817/2012

Registration Date

30-08-2012

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

PRE-CONCEPTION AND PRE-NATAL DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES (PROHIBITION OF SEX SELECTION) ACT Section 23,25,26,29

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Dr. Nirmal Agrawal Advocate - SOMANI Y G

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

05-06-2026

Disposed

11-05-2026

Judgment

04-05-2026

Judgment

27-04-2026

Judgment

20-04-2026

Judgment

Final Orders / Judgements

05-06-2026
Copy of Judgment

Dr. Nirmal Agrawal, accused of violating the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act by failing to properly maintain Form 'F' registers at his hospital, was acquitted on June 5, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting inconsistencies in witness testimony, a suspicious panchnama (seizure document), and a prior quarterly inspection report (10 days before the raid) showing no record-keeping violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Dr. Nirmal Agrawal, accused of violating the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act by failing to properly maintain Form 'F' registers at his hospital, was acquitted on June 5, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting inconsistencies in witness testimony, a suspicious panchnama (seizure document), and a prior quarterly inspection report (10 days before the raid) showing no record-keeping violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case