The State of Maharashtra vs Devchand Ramchandra Chaudhari(Abated) Advocate - JAKKALWAR G.M. — 258/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,324,143,147,148,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN030014562018

Filing Number

1454/2018

Filing Date

07-May-2018

Registration No

258/2018

Registration Date

07-May-2018

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Kadim Jalna.

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,324,143,147,148,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devchand Ramchandra Chaudhari(Abated) Advocate - JAKKALWAR G.M.

  2. 2.Santosh Gangadhar Madhowale

    Adv. JAKKALWAR G.M.

  3. 3.Kishor Ramchandra Chaudhari(Abated)

    Adv. JAKKALWAR G.M.

  4. 4.Anand Kachru Chaudhari

    Adv. JAKKALWAR G.M.

  5. 5.Umesh Nemichand Beniwale

  6. 6.Nilesh Nemichand Beniwale

  7. 7.Anil Rupchand Pare

  8. 8.Rahul Kishor Chaudhari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Devchand Ramchandra Chaudhari & Others (258/2018) The Jalna Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five surviving accused under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 325, 324, and 504 on May 7, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical inconsistencies between the complainant's written statement and oral testimony regarding injuries (particularly regarding a broken thumb and teeth extraction), noted discrepancies in witness accounts who did not directly observe the incident, and found the seized evidence (three wooden sticks) unverifiably linked to the alleged beating. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 02-May-2026

    Judgment

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 12-Dec-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 02-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  14. 02-Dec-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 06-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 19-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 29-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  43. 23-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  44. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  45. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  46. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  47. 30-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  48. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  49. 12-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  50. 30-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  51. 05-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  52. 15-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  53. 27-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  54. 08-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  55. 08-May-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  56. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  57. 27-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  58. 01-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  59. 06-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  60. 19-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  61. 23-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  62. 24-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  63. 13-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  64. 20-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  65. 01-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  66. 29-Apr-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  67. 25-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  68. 12-Nov-2021

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  69. 09-Sep-2021

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  70. 07-Jul-2021

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  71. 11-May-2021

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  72. 25-Feb-2021

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  73. 08-Dec-2020

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  74. 28-Sep-2020

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  75. 08-Jul-2020

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  76. 21-Apr-2020

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  77. 05-Feb-2020

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  78. 21-Nov-2019

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  79. 19-Aug-2019

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  80. 18-Apr-2019

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 2

  81. 18-Jan-2019

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 2

  82. 29-Oct-2018

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 2

  83. 24-Jul-2018

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 2

  84. 07-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  85. 07-May-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 258/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Devchand Ramchandra Chaudhari & Others (258/2018) The Jalna Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five surviving accused under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 325, 324, and 504 on May 7, 2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical inconsistencies between the complainant's written statement and oral testimony regarding injuries (particularly regarding a broken thumb and teeth extraction), noted discrepancies in witness accounts who did not directly observe the incident, and found the seized evidence (three wooden sticks) unverifiably linked to the alleged beating. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case