The State vs Jamshed Khan @ Jammu Yasim Khan Advocate - SA Tariq — 300575/2005

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457380. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN030007732005

Filing Number

300575/2005

Filing Date

16-Sep-2005

Registration No

300575/2005

Registration Date

16-Sep-2005

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna

Judge

47-Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457380

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jamshed Khan @ Jammu Yasim Khan Advocate - SA Tariq

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case Summary: 300575/2005 Court Decision: The accused, Jamshed Khan @ Jammu Yasim Khan, was acquitted of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 457 (house-breaking) and 380 (theft). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution alleged that the accused broke into the complainant's house between June 2-3, 2005, and stole items worth ₹8,120 (including a DVD player), the three prosecution witnesses could not positively identify the accused or provide credible testimony linking him to the crime. The complainant himself could not recognize the accused, and other witnesses lacked direct knowledge of the incident. The court held that the burden to prove guilt beyond reasonable suspicion rests with the prosecution, and absent solid evidence, the accused was entitled to the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  4. 02-May-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  13. 20-Dec-2025

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  14. 16-Dec-2025

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  15. 15-Dec-2025

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  16. 08-Dec-2025

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  17. 04-Dec-2025

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  18. 31-Aug-2025

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 4

  19. 02-Jun-2025

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -3

  20. 04-Mar-2025

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  21. 04-Dec-2024

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  22. 05-Sep-2024

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  23. 07-Jun-2024

    Restored

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  24. 07-Jun-2024

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  25. 07-Jun-2024

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  26. 14-Dec-2011

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  27. 14-Dec-2011

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  28. 14-Dec-2011

    Disposed

  29. 22-Nov-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  30. 15-Nov-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  31. 01-Nov-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  32. 15-Oct-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  33. 20-Aug-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  34. 18-Jul-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  35. 07-Feb-2011

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 13-Dec-2010

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 19-Oct-2010

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 19-Jul-2010

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 15-Apr-2010

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 17-Mar-2010

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 16-Mar-2010

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 08-Jan-2010

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  43. 08-Oct-2009

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  44. 07-Aug-2009

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  45. 28-May-2009

    Appearance

  46. 21-Apr-2009

    Appearance

  47. 19-Mar-2009

    Appearance

  48. 17-Jan-2009

    Appearance

  49. 28-Nov-2008

    Appearance

  50. 07-Oct-2008

    Appearance

  51. 14-Aug-2008

    Appearance

  52. 19-Jun-2008

    Appearance

  53. 29-Apr-2008

    Appearance

  54. 26-Mar-2008

    Appearance

  55. 12-Feb-2008

    Appearance

  56. 15-Jan-2008

    Appearance

  57. 14-Dec-2007

    Appearance

  58. 28-Nov-2007

    Appearance

  59. 01-Oct-2007

    Appearance

  60. 10-Jul-2007

    Appearance

  61. 18-Apr-2007

    Appearance

  62. 08-Dec-2006

    Appearance

  63. 04-Nov-2006

    Appearance

  64. 27-Sep-2006

    Appearance

  65. 10-Jul-2006

    Appearance

  66. 03-Jun-2006

    Appearance

  67. 15-Apr-2006

    Appearance

  68. 01-Mar-2006

    Appearance

  69. 03-Feb-2006

    Appearance

  70. 19-Dec-2005

    Appearance

  71. 18-Nov-2005

    Appearance

  72. 18-Oct-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  73. 16-Sep-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300575/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 300575/2005 Court Decision: The accused, Jamshed Khan @ Jammu Yasim Khan, was acquitted of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 457 (house-breaking) and 380 (theft). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution alleged that the accused broke into the complainant's house between June 2-3, 2005, and stole items worth ₹8,120 (including a DVD player), the three prosecution witnesses could not positively identify the accused or provide credible testimony linking him to the crime. The complainant himself could not recognize the accused, and other witnesses lacked direct knowledge of the incident. The court held that the burden to prove guilt beyond reasonable suspicion rests with the prosecution, and absent solid evidence, the accused was entitled to the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case