The State vs Sk Afroz Sk Dastagir Advocate - VA Palsirkar — 300507/2002

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 461379. Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN030004052002

Filing Number

300507/2002

Filing Date

19-Nov-2002

Registration No

300507/2002

Registration Date

19-Nov-2002

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISCHARGED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 461379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sk Afroz Sk Dastagir Advocate - VA Palsirkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Shaikh Afroz (RCC 300507/2002) The Chief Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Shaikh Afroz under Section 239 CrPC for offences under IPC Sections 461 and 379, citing insufficient evidence and case age. The court found that despite the investigating officer's testimony, critical evidence was lacking: panch witnesses in the seizure panchnama were not examined, the informant was untraceable and not examined, and key witnesses could not be located. The court held that the investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Dormant File

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Dormant File

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Dormant File

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Dormant File

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Dormant File

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    Dormant File

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 15-Sep-2025

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Jun-2025

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 04-Mar-2025

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 05-Dec-2024

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 05-Sep-2024

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 07-Jun-2024

    Restored

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  16. 07-Jun-2024

    Dormant File

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  17. 07-Jun-2024

    Dormant File ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class - 1

  18. 09-Dec-2011

    Disposed

  19. 09-Dec-2011

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  20. 30-Nov-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  21. 25-Nov-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  22. 17-Nov-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  23. 04-Nov-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  24. 11-Oct-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  25. 21-Sep-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  26. 06-Sep-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  27. 18-Aug-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  28. 28-Jul-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  29. 19-Jul-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  30. 14-Jul-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  31. 22-Jun-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  32. 20-May-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  33. 30-Apr-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  34. 30-Mar-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  35. 10-Mar-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  36. 28-Jan-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  37. 03-Jan-2011

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  38. 06-Dec-2010

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  39. 18-Sep-2010

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  40. 10-Jun-2010

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  41. 06-Mar-2010

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  42. 05-Dec-2009

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  43. 07-Aug-2009

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  44. 10-Jun-2009

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate First Class -- 2

  45. 01-Apr-2009

    Appearance

  46. 04-Feb-2009

    Appearance

  47. 18-Oct-2008

    Appearance

  48. 25-Jul-2008

    Appearance

  49. 09-Jul-2008

    Appearance

  50. 26-May-2008

    Appearance

  51. 07-Apr-2008

    Appearance

  52. 20-Feb-2008

    Appearance

  53. 30-Jan-2008

    Appearance

  54. 31-Dec-2007

    Appearance

  55. 16-Nov-2007

    Appearance

  56. 04-Jul-2007

    Appearance

  57. 05-Apr-2007

    Appearance

  58. 06-Mar-2007

    Appearance

  59. 16-Dec-2006

    Appearance

  60. 21-Nov-2006

    Appearance

  61. 13-Jun-2006

    Appearance

  62. 28-Apr-2006

    Appearance

  63. 16-Mar-2006

    Appearance

  64. 10-Feb-2006

    Appearance

  65. 02-Jan-2006

    Appearance

  66. 21-Nov-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 19-Nov-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300507/2002

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Shaikh Afroz (RCC 300507/2002) The Chief Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Shaikh Afroz under Section 239 CrPC for offences under IPC Sections 461 and 379, citing insufficient evidence and case age. The court found that despite the investigating officer's testimony, critical evidence was lacking: panch witnesses in the seizure panchnama were not examined, the informant was untraceable and not examined, and key witnesses could not be located. The court held that the investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case