The State of Maharashtra vs Baburao Umaji Kawale Advocate - KOHIRE N.K. — 300336/2003
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 408, 467, 468, 471, 34. Status: Judgment. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN030003982003
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
300336/2003
Filing Date
09-07-2003
Registration No
300336/2003
Registration Date
10-07-2003
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
8
Police Station
Kadim Jalna.
Year
2002
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Baburao Umaji Kawale Advocate - KOHIRE N.K.
Thakaji Gadba Tamkhane(Abated)
Vijay Mahadeo Mitkari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Judgment |
| 08-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 28-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This case (RCC 336/2003, State v. Baburao Umaji Kawale Advocate) involved examination of a police witness (Inspector Nirmala Mansingh Pardeshi) regarding investigation and seizure of documents. The court recorded the witness's testimony about the investigation conducted in 2003, seizure of materials under panchnama, correspondence with banks, and submission of charge sheet. The defense counsel cross-examined the witness, who denied allegations of collusion with complainant or fabricated investigation. The court accepted the witness's statements and rejected the defense contentions on 01.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This case (RCC 336/2003, State v. Baburao Umaji Kawale Advocate) involved examination of a police witness (Inspector Nirmala Mansingh Pardeshi) regarding investigation and seizure of documents. The court recorded the witness's testimony about the investigation conducted in 2003, seizure of materials under panchnama, correspondence with banks, and submission of charge sheet. The defense counsel cross-examined the witness, who denied allegations of collusion with complainant or fabricated investigation. The court accepted the witness's statements and rejected the defense contentions on 01.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts