The State vs Manik Babanrao Tehare — 300406/2002
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380511. Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGED on 23rd March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN030003472002
Filing Number
300406/2002
Filing Date
09-Sep-2002
Registration No
300406/2002
Registration Date
11-Sep-2002
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISCHARGED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manik Babanrao Tehare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Manik Babanrao Tehare (RCC 300406/2002) The Chief Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Manik Babanrao Tehare under Section 239 of the CrPC from charges under Sections 380 and 511 IPC (attempted theft). Although witnesses testified that a theft occurred at a shop on 07.08.2002 and the perpetrator identified himself as Manik, the court found the evidence insufficient for conviction as most eyewitnesses could not identify the accused. Given the case's 23-year pendency, the accused's continued absence despite warrants, and the impossibility of securing evidence for conviction, the court determined no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2026
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2025
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2025
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2025
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2024
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2024
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2024
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Feb-2024
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2023
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2023
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-May-2023
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2023
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2022
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2022
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2022
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2022
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2022
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2022
Restored
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2014
Disposed
-
11-Mar-2014
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jan-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jul-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jan-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jan-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Dec-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Nov-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Oct-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Sep-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Aug-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Feb-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Oct-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Aug-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Mar-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2009
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2009
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2009
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2009
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-May-2009
Appearance
-
17-Apr-2009
Appearance
-
17-Mar-2009
Appearance
-
16-Jan-2009
Appearance
-
25-Nov-2008
Appearance
-
10-Sep-2008
Appearance
-
08-Aug-2008
Appearance
-
05-Jul-2008
Appearance
-
06-Jun-2008
Appearance
-
07-Apr-2008
Appearance
-
18-Feb-2008
Appearance
-
07-Jan-2008
Appearance
-
19-Nov-2007
Appearance
-
04-Aug-2007
Appearance
-
28-Jun-2007
Appearance
-
27-Apr-2007
Appearance
-
26-Feb-2007
Appearance
-
19-Jan-2007
Appearance
-
20-Nov-2006
Appearance
-
19-Sep-2006
Appearance
-
19-Jul-2006
Appearance
-
06-Jun-2006
Appearance
-
27-Apr-2006
Appearance
-
15-Feb-2006
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Sep-2002
Case filed
Registration No. 300406/2002
Case Summary: State v. Manik Babanrao Tehare (RCC 300406/2002) The Chief Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Manik Babanrao Tehare under Section 239 of the CrPC from charges under Sections 380 and 511 IPC (attempted theft). Although witnesses testified that a theft occurred at a shop on 07.08.2002 and the perpetrator identified himself as Manik, the court found the evidence insufficient for conviction as most eyewitnesses could not identify the accused. Given the case's 23-year pendency, the accused's continued absence despite warrants, and the impossibility of securing evidence for conviction, the court determined no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts