The State Of Maharashtra vs Ashok Mahaveerchan Kolani Advocate - SYED SHARIK SHAKEEL — 27/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 398,387,441,452,143,147,506(2). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN030001822016
Filing Number
182/2016
Filing Date
14-Jan-2016
Registration No
27/2016
Registration Date
14-Jan-2016
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
139
Police Station
Sadar Bazar Jalna.
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashok Mahaveerchan Kolani Advocate - SYED SHARIK SHAKEEL
-
2.Sunita Sakharam Aadbane
-
3.Shila Baban Tidke
-
4.Sudhakar Manohar Pawar
-
5.Vikky Girdharilal Rotre
-
6.Mayur Mangalchand Choudhari
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Dec-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Aug-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jul-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Feb-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Aug-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jul-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-May-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2023
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jul-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jul-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-May-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2022
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2021
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Oct-2021
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2021
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2021
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2021
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2021
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Feb-2021
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2020
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2020
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jul-2020
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2020
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2020
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jul-2019
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: The application for return of seized property was partly allowed. The court directed the Investigating Officer to return item no. 7 (three wooden counters) to the applicant/informant upon execution of a Rs. 10,000 supratnama bond, with conditions that the property not be sold, altered, or encumbered, and be produced in court as directed. A detailed panchanama was to be prepared during handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jul-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Apr-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jan-2019
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Sep-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jul-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Dec-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Oct-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jun-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Mar-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jan-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2016
Case Summary: The application for return of seized property was partly allowed. The court directed the Investigating Officer to return item no. 7 (three wooden counters) to the applicant/informant upon execution of a Rs. 10,000 supratnama bond, with conditions that the property not be sold, altered, or encumbered, and be produced in court as directed. A detailed panchanama was to be prepared during handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts