The State Through P.S Maujpuri vs Ramesh Vankati Shinde Advocate - RD Deshmukh — 300087/1999
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395342. Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN030000651999
Filing Number
300087/1999
Filing Date
15-Jun-1999
Registration No
300087/1999
Registration Date
15-Jun-2000
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Jalna
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Through P.S Maujpuri
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramesh Vankati Shinde Advocate - RD Deshmukh
-
2.Maroti Sayyana pawar
-
3.Ravi Uttam Shinde
-
4.Vakil Baburao Shinde
-
5.Ashok Lalu Pawar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Session, Jalna, as the charges under Section 395 IPC (dacoity) are exclusively triable by Session Court. Despite multiple warrants and proclamations, the accused remained absconding; only two witnesses testified that theft occurred in medical shops but could not identify the perpetrators, while other witnesses and the investigating officer were untraceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2026
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2025
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2025
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2025
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2024
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2024
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2024
Restored
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2024
Dormant File
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2024
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2014
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2014
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2014
Disposed
-
26-Feb-2014
Restored
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jan-2014
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Aug-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2013
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Dec-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Sep-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jun-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Apr-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2012
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Dec-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Nov-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Nov-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Aug-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jul-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Feb-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jan-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jan-2011
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Dec-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Sep-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Apr-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jan-2010
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Oct-2009
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Aug-2009
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jun-2009
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2009
Appearance
-
28-Apr-2009
Appearance
-
21-Feb-2009
Appearance
-
19-Jan-2009
Appearance
-
08-Dec-2008
Appearance
-
13-Nov-2008
Appearance
-
26-Sep-2008
Appearance
-
16-Aug-2008
Appearance
-
22-Jul-2008
Appearance
-
08-Jul-2008
Appearance
-
26-May-2008
Appearance
-
02-Apr-2008
Appearance
-
14-Mar-2008
Appearance
-
06-Feb-2008
Appearance
-
10-Jan-2008
Appearance
-
10-Dec-2007
Appearance
-
07-Nov-2007
Appearance
-
04-Oct-2007
Appearance
-
07-Sep-2007
Appearance
-
27-Jul-2007
Appearance
-
22-Jun-2007
Appearance
-
17-May-2007
Appearance
-
16-Mar-2007
Appearance
-
16-Feb-2007
Appearance
-
09-Jan-2007
Appearance
-
23-Nov-2006
Appearance
-
18-Oct-2006
Appearance
-
23-Aug-2006
Appearance
-
22-Jun-2006
Appearance
-
06-May-2006
Appearance
-
01-Apr-2006
Appearance
-
14-Feb-2006
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-1999
Case filed
Registration No. 300087/1999
The Chief Judicial Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Session, Jalna, as the charges under Section 395 IPC (dacoity) are exclusively triable by Session Court. Despite multiple warrants and proclamations, the accused remained absconding; only two witnesses testified that theft occurred in medical shops but could not identify the perpetrators, while other witnesses and the investigating officer were untraceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts