Mr Mahendra Laxminarayan Bhakkad vs Mr Gopal Babulal Yadav — 709/2025

Case Summary: RCS No. 709/2025 The court allowed the plaintiffs' temporary injunction application. The plaintiffs, who own property in Jalna that was reserved for a garden in the development plan, sought to prevent Defendant No. 1 from continuing a hunger strike and displaying defamatory banners, and to stop Defendant No. 2 (Jalna Municipal Corporation) from taking coercive action against them. The court found the plaintiffs had a prima-facie case based on their deemed construction permission (the municipality failed to respond within 60 days of their application), would suffer irreparable loss without protection, and that the balance of convenience favored them. Defendant No. 2 is directed not to take coercive action until final suit judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.