Hasmabi Jabbar Parsuwale vs The State of Maharashtra — 109/2022

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference

CNR: MHJN020020402022

Filing Number

1977/2022

Filing Date

21-Oct-2022

Registration No

109/2022

Registration Date

21-Oct-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna

Judge

29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hasmabi Jabbar Parsuwale

    Adv. SHINDE E U

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

  2. 2.The Special Land Acquisition Officer (Krushna Khore)

  3. 3.The Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 14-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    5th Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    5th Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    5th Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  9. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    5th Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  11. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  12. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  13. 09-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 05-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  15. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  17. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  18. 10-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  19. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  20. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  21. 15-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  22. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  23. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  24. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  25. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  26. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  27. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  28. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  29. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  30. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  31. 29-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  32. 10-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  33. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  34. 30-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  35. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  36. 05-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  37. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  38. 08-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  39. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  40. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  41. 01-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 109/2022 Outcome: The court allowed Respondent No. 3's application to set aside the ex-parte order. Although Respondent No. 3 was duly served with notice but failed to appear, the court deemed it just and proper to set aside the ex-parte order and permitted Respondent No. 3 to appear and file a written statement, allowing the matter to be decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  42. 01-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  43. 14-Dec-2023

    Order on Exh

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  44. 06-Dec-2023

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  45. 23-Nov-2023

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  46. 12-Oct-2023

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  47. 11-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  48. 09-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  49. 14-Jul-2023

    Appearance

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  50. 19-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  51. 20-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  52. 01-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  53. 22-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  54. 17-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  55. 03-Dec-2022

    Appearance

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  56. 21-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 21-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 109/2022 Outcome: The court allowed Respondent No. 3's application to set aside the ex-parte order. Although Respondent No. 3 was duly served with notice but failed to appear, the court deemed it just and proper to set aside the ex-parte order and permitted Respondent No. 3 to appear and file a written statement, allowing the matter to be decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case