Mahaduappa Gangappa Pongudwale vs State of Maharashtra Through Collector,Jalna. — 200581/2013
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHJN020019652014
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
202484/2014
Filing Date
23-07-2013
Registration No
200581/2013
Registration Date
16-08-2013
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahaduappa Gangappa Pongudwale
Adv. DANDE N B
Ramappa Gangappa Pongudwale
Bhauappa Gangappa Pongudwale
Shankarappa Gangappa Pongudwale
Mohanappa Gangappa Pongudwale
Krushnabai Thakkappa Aushikar
Girjabai Sayaji Misal
Seetabai Shivajiappa Pongudwale
Rantnamalabai Shivajiappa Pongudawale
Anjanabai Shivajiappa Pongudwale
Meerabai Shivajiappa Pongudwale
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Collector,Jalna.
Dy. Collector Land Acquisition, Krushnakhore, Jalna
Executive Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: 29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: LAR No. 581/2013 Outcome: The court allowed the State and LAO's application for condonation of delay. The ex parte order against Respondent No. 1 (State) was set aside, and both respondents were permitted to file written statements. The court found the 7-year delay justified given the amendment of the proper respondent authority in 2019 and fresh notices issued in 2023, and held that any delay-related costs would be compensated through Land Acquisition Act interest provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: LAR No. 581/2013 Outcome: The court allowed the State and LAO's application for condonation of delay. The ex parte order against Respondent No. 1 (State) was set aside, and both respondents were permitted to file written statements. The court found the 7-year delay justified given the amendment of the proper respondent authority in 2019 and fresh notices issued in 2023, and held that any delay-related costs would be compensated through Land Acquisition Act interest provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts