Shivaji Annasaheb Ghungrad vs The State of Maharashtra Through Tahasildar Advocate - KOLHE D N — 535/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN020019542021
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
1915/2021
Filing Date
10-12-2021
Registration No
535/2021
Registration Date
10-12-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaji Annasaheb Ghungrad
Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.
Shreepat Annasaheb Ghungard
Sindhubai Devidas Ghungarad
Kundlik Bhaguji Jadhav
Sampat Devji Jadhav
Suresh Devidas Ghunagrad
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Tahasildar Advocate - KOLHE D N
Sub Divisional Officer
Special Land Acquisition Officer
The State of Maharashtra Through Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 13-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 27-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 24-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 535/2021 Outcome: The plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction was rejected on 13 September 2023. Key Facts: Plaintiffs sought to restrain defendants from constructing a road through their agricultural land (Blocks 90, 91, 97) in Jalna. Defendants claimed measurements showed the road runs along a riverbank west of the properties, not through plaintiff-owned land, and that no land acquisition was necessary. Court's Decision: The judge found plaintiffs failed to prove a prima facie case, as they provided no maps or measurements demonstrating the road passed through their property. The defendant's spot inspection report, panchnama, and measurement supported that the road was being constructed on riverbank land (not owned by plaintiffs), making the question of land acquisition moot. Plaintiffs have opportunity to pursue relief on the merits of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 535/2021 Outcome: The plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction was rejected on 13 September 2023. Key Facts: Plaintiffs sought to restrain defendants from constructing a road through their agricultural land (Blocks 90, 91, 97) in Jalna. Defendants claimed measurements showed the road runs along a riverbank west of the properties, not through plaintiff-owned land, and that no land acquisition was necessary. Court's Decision: The judge found plaintiffs failed to prove a prima facie case, as they provided no maps or measurements demonstrating the road passed through their property. The defendant's spot inspection report, panchnama, and measurement supported that the road was being constructed on riverbank land (not owned by plaintiffs), making the question of land acquisition moot. Plaintiffs have opportunity to pursue relief on the merits of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts