Dynaneshwar Gangadhar Waghmare vs Laxman Sampat Yashvante Advocate - KULKARNI B.M. — 279/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN020016952017
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
1526/2017
Filing Date
17-08-2017
Registration No
279/2017
Registration Date
17-08-2017
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
33-Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dynaneshwar Gangadhar Waghmare
Adv. BHANDARGE D S
Respondent(s)
Laxman Sampat Yashvante Advocate - KULKARNI B.M.
Shilabai Laxman Yashwante
Adv. KULKARNI B.M.
Gramsevak
Hearing History
Judge: 33-Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 279/2017 - Dyaneshwar v. Laxman & Ors The court allowed the plaintiff's application to substitute the deceased defendant No. 1 (who died on 27.05.2023) with his legal representatives as defendants 1(1) to 1(7). The plaintiff was granted 14 days to amend the plaint and file it, after which suit summons will be issued to the newly added defendants. The property dispute case will proceed with all parties to ensure proper adjudication on merits and avoid multiplicity of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 279/2017 - Dyaneshwar v. Laxman & Ors The court allowed the plaintiff's application to substitute the deceased defendant No. 1 (who died on 27.05.2023) with his legal representatives as defendants 1(1) to 1(7). The plaintiff was granted 14 days to amend the plaint and file it, after which suit summons will be issued to the newly added defendants. The property dispute case will proceed with all parties to ensure proper adjudication on merits and avoid multiplicity of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts