Amit Shashikant Patwari vs Sitabai Vishwanath Sawant Advocate - RATHI S.G. — 418/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 12. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Compliance Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHJN020016862025

e-Filing Number

31-07-2025

Filing Number

1725/2025

Filing Date

31-Jul-2025

Registration No

418/2025

Registration Date

11-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna

Judge

29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amit Shashikant Patwari

    Adv. LIKHE D P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sitabai Vishwanath Sawant Advocate - RATHI S.G.

  2. 2.Nasrin Begum Sadat Khan

  3. 3.Asmat begum Sohael Sidhiqui

  4. 4.Shobhabai Bhaskar Chowdhary

  5. 5.Shilpa Suresh Maniyar

  6. 6.Shriti Prashant Ladda Maiden Name Shriti Kisankumar Daga

  7. 7.Kisankumar Mathuradas Daga

  8. 8.Dadasaheb Annasaheb Bhutekar

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Compliance

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 04-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Amit Shashikant Patwari v. Sitabai Vishwanath Sawant & Others (418/2025) Petitioner Amit Patwari filed a suit for specific performance of contract. Defendants 5-7 moved an application under CPC Order VII Rule 11(d) contending the suit was barred by limitation and the cause of action was illusory. The court rejected the defendants' application, holding that the plaintiff adequately disclosed a cause of action in paragraph 19 of the plaint. Since limitation is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence evaluation, the plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold stage without allowing the plaintiff an opportunity to present evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  11. 04-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 07-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    Citation

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  15. 23-Jan-2026

    Citation

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  16. 03-Jan-2026

    Citation

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  17. 02-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  18. 15-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  19. 02-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  20. 21-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  21. 31-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  22. 04-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  23. 12-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 31-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 418/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Amit Shashikant Patwari v. Sitabai Vishwanath Sawant & Others (418/2025) Petitioner Amit Patwari filed a suit for specific performance of contract. Defendants 5-7 moved an application under CPC Order VII Rule 11(d) contending the suit was barred by limitation and the cause of action was illusory. The court rejected the defendants' application, holding that the plaintiff adequately disclosed a cause of action in paragraph 19 of the plaint. Since limitation is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence evaluation, the plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold stage without allowing the plaintiff an opportunity to present evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case