Houshalyabai Devidas Dongre vs Nilawati Devidas Dongre Advocate - KULKARNI P.W., MAHAJAN D S — 200433/2013

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforperpetualInjunction. Status: Citation. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN020011472013

Citation

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

200433/2013

Filing Date

24-09-2013

Registration No

200433/2013

Registration Date

24-09-2013

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section SuitforperpetualInjunction

Petitioner(s)

Houshalyabai Devidas Dongre

Adv. DESHPANDE M.R.

Respondent(s)

Nilawati Devidas Dongre Advocate - KULKARNI P.W., MAHAJAN D S

Vaijinath So Devidas Dongre

Adv. KULKARNI P.W.,MAHAJAN D S

Ramnath So Devidas Dongre

Adv. KULKARNI P.W.,MAHAJAN D S

Soumitra Wo Suresh Gore

Adv. KULKARNI P.W.,MAHAJAN D S

Rukhmini Wo Shivaji Wagh

Adv. KULKARNI P.W.,MAHAJAN D S

Gangubai Wo Vaijinath Dongre

Adv. KULKARNI P.W.,MAHAJAN D S

Rukhaminibai Wo Ramnath Dongre

Adv. KULKARNI P.W.,MAHAJAN D S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division

11-06-2026

Citation

07-05-2026

Citation

05-05-2026

Citation

27-04-2026

Citation

23-04-2026

Citation

Interim Orders

30-12-2013
Order on T.I.
17-10-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: In R.C.S. No. 433/2013 (Houshalyabai v. Nilawati), the Civil Judge at Jalna allowed the Assistant Sub-Registrar's application for production of documents on 17.10.2024. The plaintiff's objection that she was not a party to the documents lacked substance; the defendant's application to call the Sub-Registrar as a witness along with five sale-deeds was a routine procedural matter at the discovery stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In R.C.S. No. 433/2013 (Houshalyabai v. Nilawati), the Civil Judge at Jalna allowed the Assistant Sub-Registrar's application for production of documents on 17.10.2024. The plaintiff's objection that she was not a party to the documents lacked substance; the defendant's application to call the Sub-Registrar as a witness along with five sale-deeds was a routine procedural matter at the discovery stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case