Dilip Nagusing Bahure vs Babasaheb Balaji Singare — 236/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1,2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN020009342025

e-Filing Number

23-04-2025

Filing Number

958/2025

Filing Date

23-Apr-2025

Registration No

236/2025

Registration Date

24-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Nagusing Bahure

    Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

  2. 2.Nagusing Kisan Bahure

    Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

  3. 3.Pratapsing Nagusing Bahure

    Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

  4. 4.Bhagabai Dilip Bahure

    Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

  5. 5.Sanjusing Nagusing Bahure

    Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

  6. 6.Pandharinath Chandrabhan Singare

    Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

  7. 7.Mangesh Pandharinagh Singare

    Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Babasaheb Balaji Singare

  2. 2.Chandrabhan Madhavrao Singare

  3. 3.Govind Vishwanth Singare

  4. 4.Shantilal Pralhadrao Singare

  5. 5.Champalal Ramsing Jonwal

  6. 6.Kishor Subhash Singare

  7. 7.Tahsildar Tahsil Office Badnapur

  8. 8.Sub Divisional Officer Jalna

  9. 9.The Collector Jalna

  10. 10.Maharashtra State through Collector Jalna

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 236/2025 Court Order (dated 16.03.2026): The court allowed respondents 1, 3, and 6's application to recall the ex-parte order issued on 28.11.2025 and permitted them to file their written statement. The court granted the application with cost of Rs. 500/-, finding that the respondents' delay in obtaining necessary documents was not deliberate and they were willing to file their defense. The case was directed for further proceedings on merits regarding the petitioners' claim to property ownership and the respondents' right to construct a new road on the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 14-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  11. 22-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 29-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  15. 22-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  17. 19-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  18. 03-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  19. 18-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  20. 09-May-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 23-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 236/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 236/2025 Court Order (dated 16.03.2026): The court allowed respondents 1, 3, and 6's application to recall the ex-parte order issued on 28.11.2025 and permitted them to file their written statement. The court granted the application with cost of Rs. 500/-, finding that the respondents' delay in obtaining necessary documents was not deliberate and they were willing to file their defense. The case was directed for further proceedings on merits regarding the petitioners' claim to property ownership and the respondents' right to construct a new road on the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case