sow. lata wo pankaj lakhlani throu. Gpa Holder pankaj Labhshankar lakhlani vs Shaileshpuri Jerampuri Goswami Advocate - PISURE V.T. — 200064/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitfordeclarationandSuitforinjunction. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN020008992014
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
200671/2014
Filing Date
25-07-2014
Registration No
200064/2014
Registration Date
02-08-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
sow. lata wo pankaj lakhlani throu. Gpa Holder pankaj Labhshankar lakhlani
Adv. CHITNIS V.G.
Kum.Durva
Adv. CHITNIS V.G.
Respondent(s)
Shaileshpuri Jerampuri Goswami Advocate - PISURE V.T.
Manohar
Adv. PISURE T B
Hearing History
Judge: 29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case 200064/2014 Summary In this property ownership dispute, the court allowed the plaintiffs' application and issued witness summons to the Talathi (revenue officer), Jalna to produce original documents regarding the suit property. The plaintiffs claimed original documents were submitted to the Tehsil Office and they were denied certified copies. The court found no obstacle to issuing summons for document production to enable both parties to lead evidence in proving their ownership claims over the immovable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 200064/2014 Summary In this property ownership dispute, the court allowed the plaintiffs' application and issued witness summons to the Talathi (revenue officer), Jalna to produce original documents regarding the suit property. The plaintiffs claimed original documents were submitted to the Tehsil Office and they were denied certified copies. The court found no obstacle to issuing summons for document production to enable both parties to lead evidence in proving their ownership claims over the immovable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts