Sow. lata wo pankaj lakhlani throu. Gpa Holder pankaj Labhshankar lakhlani vs HitendraKumar Amrutlal Sawala Advocate - PISURE V.T. — 200063/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitfordeclarationandSuitforinjunction. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN020008982014
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
200670/2014
Filing Date
25-07-2014
Registration No
200063/2014
Registration Date
02-08-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sow. lata wo pankaj lakhlani throu. Gpa Holder pankaj Labhshankar lakhlani
Adv. CHITNIS V.G.
Ku.Durva Do Pankaj Lakhlani
Respondent(s)
HitendraKumar Amrutlal Sawala Advocate - PISURE V.T.
Kishor Jagannath Shingare
Hearing History
Judge: 29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Spl.C.S.No.63/2014 Outcome: Plaintiffs' application allowed. The court issued witness summons to the Talathi (revenue officer), Jalna to produce original documents relating to the suit property held in the Tehsil Office records. Costs awarded in cause. Key Facts: This property dispute involved competing ownership claims between plaintiffs and defendants nos.1 and 2. After issues were recast, the court permitted both parties to lead oral and documentary evidence. The court granted the plaintiffs' request for document production, finding that original documents submitted to the Talathi were now in Tehsil Office custody and certified copies had not been provided to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Spl.C.S.No.63/2014 Outcome: Plaintiffs' application allowed. The court issued witness summons to the Talathi (revenue officer), Jalna to produce original documents relating to the suit property held in the Tehsil Office records. Costs awarded in cause. Key Facts: This property dispute involved competing ownership claims between plaintiffs and defendants nos.1 and 2. After issues were recast, the court permitted both parties to lead oral and documentary evidence. The court granted the plaintiffs' request for document production, finding that original documents submitted to the Talathi were now in Tehsil Office custody and certified copies had not been provided to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts