sow. lata wo pankaj lakhlani throu. Gpa Holder pankaj Labhshankar lakhlani vs Vipulkumar Amrutlal Sawala Advocate - PISURE V.T. — 200061/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitfordeclarationandSuitforinjunction. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN020008962014
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
200668/2014
Filing Date
02-08-2014
Registration No
200061/2014
Registration Date
02-08-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
sow. lata wo pankaj lakhlani throu. Gpa Holder pankaj Labhshankar lakhlani
Adv. CHITNIS V.G.
Kum. Durva Do Pankaj Lakhlani Thru Their Power of Attorney Pankaj Labhshankar Lakhlani
Adv. CHITNIS V.G.
Respondent(s)
Vipulkumar Amrutlal Sawala Advocate - PISURE V.T.
Kishor Jagannath Shingare
Hearing History
Judge: 29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Spl.C.S.No.61/2014 – Lata v. Vipulkumar (Order dated 08.07.2025) The court allowed the plaintiffs' application seeking witness summons to Talathi, Jalna for production of original documents related to the suit property. The plaintiffs contended that original documents were submitted to the Tehsil Office and they were not provided certified copies. The court found no impediment to issuing summons for document production, particularly since immovable property rights are involved and issues were recast, requiring parties to present complete evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Spl.C.S.No.61/2014 – Lata v. Vipulkumar (Order dated 08.07.2025) The court allowed the plaintiffs' application seeking witness summons to Talathi, Jalna for production of original documents related to the suit property. The plaintiffs contended that original documents were submitted to the Tehsil Office and they were not provided certified copies. The court found no impediment to issuing summons for document production, particularly since immovable property rights are involved and issues were recast, requiring parties to present complete evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts