Sham Madavappa@Mahadevappa Khatade vs Ramesh Manikrao Paithane — 143/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN020006452022

Filing Number

632/2022

Filing Date

24-Mar-2022

Registration No

143/2022

Registration Date

25-Mar-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna

Judge

29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sham Madavappa@Mahadevappa Khatade

    Adv. SHINDE S Y

  2. 2.Ashok Madhavappa @ Mahadeoappa Khatade

  3. 3.Sanju Madhavappa @ Mahadeoappa Khatade

  4. 4.Ashabai Madhavappa @ Mahadeoappa Khatade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Manikrao Paithane

  2. 2.Shivaji Maganrao Doke(Died) Throu Sandhya Shivaji Doke

    Adv. DHANNE N M

  3. 3.Collector Office

  4. 4.Tahsildar,Jalna

  5. 5.Circle Officer

  6. 6.Talathi

  7. 7.Gram Sevak

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 05-Jan-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  7. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 08-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  11. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  15. 18-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  16. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  17. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  18. 08-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  19. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  20. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    4th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division

  21. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  22. 14-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  23. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  24. 27-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  25. 21-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  26. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  27. 30-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  28. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  29. 28-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  30. 28-Jun-2023

    Issues

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  31. 02-May-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 143/2022 Outcome: Application ALLOWED. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 from obstructing the plaintiffs' possession of plot No. 58 or alienating/creating third-party interests over the property until the main suit's disposal. Key Finding: The court found the sale-deed dated 19.03.2020 void ab-initio because: (1) it was executed after the original owner's death on 13.02.2020; (2) the GPA holder (Defendant No. 2) lacked authorization to sell—the GPA only permitted presenting documents for registration; and (3) the GPA automatically terminated upon the principal's death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 02-May-2023

    Issues

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  33. 13-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  34. 05-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  35. 27-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  36. 13-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  37. 21-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  38. 27-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  39. 20-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  40. 22-Nov-2022

    Appearance

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  41. 15-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  42. 29-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  43. 30-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  44. 01-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  45. 08-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  46. 10-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  47. 21-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison

  48. 29-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 24-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 143/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 143/2022 Outcome: Application ALLOWED. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 from obstructing the plaintiffs' possession of plot No. 58 or alienating/creating third-party interests over the property until the main suit's disposal. Key Finding: The court found the sale-deed dated 19.03.2020 void ab-initio because: (1) it was executed after the original owner's death on 13.02.2020; (2) the GPA holder (Defendant No. 2) lacked authorization to sell—the GPA only permitted presenting documents for registration; and (3) the GPA automatically terminated upon the principal's death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case