Anand Vasantlal Sambare vs Amer Moiz Khan Advocate - SAYYED R. M. — 131/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1&2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHJN020005892025

e-Filing Number

18-03-2025

Filing Number

608/2025

Filing Date

19-Mar-2025

Registration No

131/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1&2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anand Vasantlal Sambare

    Adv. MANTE G.L.

  2. 2.Amit Bhalchandra Chawale

    Adv. MANTE G.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amer Moiz Khan Advocate - SAYYED R. M.

  2. 2.Idris Ahmad Ansari Jabbar Ahamad Ansari

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  15. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  18. 04-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  19. 19-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  20. 25-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  21. 21-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  22. 19-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  23. 15-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  24. 08-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  25. 05-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  26. 25-Mar-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: 131/2025 Outcome: Interim injunction (temporary restraining order) GRANTED The court issued an interim ex-parte injunction restraining Respondent No. 1 (Amer Moiz Khan Advocate) from selling, transferring, or creating third-party rights over a property (Plot No. 9545, measuring 83.17 sq.m. in Jalna) until further notice. The petitioners claimed they sold the property to the respondent via registered deed (No. 3156/2023) on 04.08.2023 for ₹30,01,000, but the respondent failed to pay the full amount and attempted to prevent their possession. The court found the petitioners had established prima facie rights and that an interim order would not cause undue hardship to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 25-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  28. 24-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 19-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 131/2025 Outcome: Interim injunction (temporary restraining order) GRANTED The court issued an interim ex-parte injunction restraining Respondent No. 1 (Amer Moiz Khan Advocate) from selling, transferring, or creating third-party rights over a property (Plot No. 9545, measuring 83.17 sq.m. in Jalna) until further notice. The petitioners claimed they sold the property to the respondent via registered deed (No. 3156/2023) on 04.08.2023 for ₹30,01,000, but the respondent failed to pay the full amount and attempted to prevent their possession. The court found the petitioners had established prima facie rights and that an interim order would not cause undue hardship to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case