Anand Vasantlal Sambare vs Amer Moiz Khan Advocate - SAYYED R. M. — 131/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1&2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN020005892025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2025
Filing Number
608/2025
Filing Date
19-03-2025
Registration No
131/2025
Registration Date
19-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anand Vasantlal Sambare
Adv. MANTE G.L.
Amit Bhalchandra Chawale
Adv. MANTE G.L.
Respondent(s)
Amer Moiz Khan Advocate - SAYYED R. M.
Idris Ahmad Ansari Jabbar Ahamad Ansari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 131/2025 Outcome: Interim injunction (temporary restraining order) GRANTED The court issued an interim ex-parte injunction restraining Respondent No. 1 (Amer Moiz Khan Advocate) from selling, transferring, or creating third-party rights over a property (Plot No. 9545, measuring 83.17 sq.m. in Jalna) until further notice. The petitioners claimed they sold the property to the respondent via registered deed (No. 3156/2023) on 04.08.2023 for ₹30,01,000, but the respondent failed to pay the full amount and attempted to prevent their possession. The court found the petitioners had established prima facie rights and that an interim order would not cause undue hardship to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 131/2025 Outcome: Interim injunction (temporary restraining order) GRANTED The court issued an interim ex-parte injunction restraining Respondent No. 1 (Amer Moiz Khan Advocate) from selling, transferring, or creating third-party rights over a property (Plot No. 9545, measuring 83.17 sq.m. in Jalna) until further notice. The petitioners claimed they sold the property to the respondent via registered deed (No. 3156/2023) on 04.08.2023 for ₹30,01,000, but the respondent failed to pay the full amount and attempted to prevent their possession. The court found the petitioners had established prima facie rights and that an interim order would not cause undue hardship to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts