Bharat Damodharraoji Newasekar vs Manish @ Munna Imannual Abbasi Advocate - RAUT M.S. — 200041/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforSpecificPerformanceandSuitforInjunction. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN020005162014
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
200289/2014
Filing Date
26-04-2014
Registration No
200041/2014
Registration Date
26-04-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bharat Damodharraoji Newasekar
Adv. SHAIKH E.A.
Respondent(s)
Manish @ Munna Imannual Abbasi Advocate - RAUT M.S.
Ashis Imannual Abbasi Died Thru. LR. 2-A Nova Ashish Abbasi
Tamanna Ashish Abbasi ug Grandmother Liyona Mannual Abbasi
3. Anupama Do Immanual Abbasi @ Anupama Massi Khan
4.Raina Do Immanual Abbasi @ Raina Sidharth Khillare
Adv. RAUT M.S.
Liyona Mannual Abbasi
Sow. Rajni Kailas Newasekar
Adv. KULKARNI P.W.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Amended Plaint
Compliance
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 02-05-2026 | Compliance |
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 06-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Bharat Newasekar v. Manish & Ors (2014/41) Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the suit under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Details: The plaintiff sought to add a relief for recovery of possession of the disputed property from the defendants, claiming they illegally seized it after defendants 1 & 5 sold it to defendant 6 (Rajani). The court found the amendment was bonafide, necessary for proper adjudication, and would not prejudice the defendants or alter the suit's fundamental nature. The plaintiff was directed to deposit Rs. 500 as costs with the District Legal Services Authority and file an amended plaint within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Bharat Newasekar v. Manish & Ors (2014/41) Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the suit under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Details: The plaintiff sought to add a relief for recovery of possession of the disputed property from the defendants, claiming they illegally seized it after defendants 1 & 5 sold it to defendant 6 (Rajani). The court found the amendment was bonafide, necessary for proper adjudication, and would not prejudice the defendants or alter the suit's fundamental nature. The plaintiff was directed to deposit Rs. 500 as costs with the District Legal Services Authority and file an amended plaint within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts