Shaikh Kayuum Shaikh Husen vs Shaik Ajij Shaikh Husen Advocate - SAYYED MUDASSAR N. — 103/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN020004002020
Filing Number
391/2020
Filing Date
29-Feb-2020
Registration No
103/2020
Registration Date
04-Mar-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shaikh Kayuum Shaikh Husen
Adv. KULKARNI P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shaik Ajij Shaikh Husen Advocate - SAYYED MUDASSAR N.
-
2.Shaik Ajim Shaik Husen
-
3.Shaik Mahebub shaik Hussen
Adv. SAYYED MUDASSAR N.
-
4.Shaik Raisabi Shaik Ajij
-
5.Shaik Ujma shaik Ajij
-
6.Shaik Jawed Shaik Ajij
-
7.Shaik Shain Shaik Mahebub
Adv. SAYYED MUDASSAR N.
-
8.Shaik Rehan shaik Mahebub
-
9.Shaikh Shifa Shaikh Hussen
-
10.Shaikh Khamar Shaikh Ajim
Adv. SAYYED MUDASSAR N.
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
04-May-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
20-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgment
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
18-Feb-2026
Judgment
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
10-Feb-2026
Judgment
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
22-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
14-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
07-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
20-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
05-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
22-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
03-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
26-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
12-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
13-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
09-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
11-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
07-Jul-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
27-Apr-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
04-Apr-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Feb-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
16-Dec-2022
No W.S. Order
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
01-Dec-2022
Compliance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
14-Oct-2022
Compliance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
04-Aug-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 103/2020 Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court dismissed the main petition but granted relief regarding litigation costs. Respondents 1, 5, 7, and 10 were ordered to pay Rs. 250 each to the petitioner as cost compensation under the condition that the record be placed before the court. The court found the petitioner's delay argument reasonable given the 36-day delay in filing the case, but rejected other grounds of the petition as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
18-Jul-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
13-Jun-2022
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
21-Apr-2022
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Apr-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
02-Mar-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
21-Jan-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
14-Dec-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
11-Nov-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
01-Oct-2021
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
18-Aug-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
12-Jul-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
07-May-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
03-Apr-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
27-Jan-2021
Appearance
5th Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison
-
26-Nov-2020
Appearance
5th Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison
-
07-Sep-2020
Appearance
5th Joint Civil Judge Senior Divison
-
14-Aug-2020
Appearance
4th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division
-
04-Jul-2020
Appearance
4th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Feb-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 103/2020
Case Summary: 103/2020 Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court dismissed the main petition but granted relief regarding litigation costs. Respondents 1, 5, 7, and 10 were ordered to pay Rs. 250 each to the petitioner as cost compensation under the condition that the record be placed before the court. The court found the petitioner's delay argument reasonable given the 36-day delay in filing the case, but rejected other grounds of the petition as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts