Shaikh Kayuum Shaikh Husen vs Shaik Ajij Shaikh Husen Advocate - SAYYED MUDASSAR N. — 103/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN020004002020
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
391/2020
Filing Date
29-02-2020
Registration No
103/2020
Registration Date
04-03-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Kayuum Shaikh Husen
Adv. KULKARNI P. P.
Respondent(s)
Shaik Ajij Shaikh Husen Advocate - SAYYED MUDASSAR N.
Shaik Ajim Shaik Husen
Shaik Mahebub shaik Hussen
Adv. SAYYED MUDASSAR N.
Shaik Raisabi Shaik Ajij
Shaik Ujma shaik Ajij
Shaik Jawed Shaik Ajij
Shaik Shain Shaik Mahebub
Adv. SAYYED MUDASSAR N.
Shaik Rehan shaik Mahebub
Shaikh Shifa Shaikh Hussen
Shaikh Khamar Shaikh Ajim
Adv. SAYYED MUDASSAR N.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 103/2020 Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court dismissed the main petition but granted relief regarding litigation costs. Respondents 1, 5, 7, and 10 were ordered to pay Rs. 250 each to the petitioner as cost compensation under the condition that the record be placed before the court. The court found the petitioner's delay argument reasonable given the 36-day delay in filing the case, but rejected other grounds of the petition as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 103/2020 Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court dismissed the main petition but granted relief regarding litigation costs. Respondents 1, 5, 7, and 10 were ordered to pay Rs. 250 each to the petitioner as cost compensation under the condition that the record be placed before the court. The court found the petitioner's delay argument reasonable given the 36-day delay in filing the case, but rejected other grounds of the petition as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts