Sukhdev Dashrath Weldode vs The State of Maharashtra Through Collector Advocate - MATE A D — 75/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN020003812021
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
384/2021
Filing Date
25-02-2021
Registration No
75/2021
Registration Date
25-02-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sukhdev Dashrath Weldode
Adv. MAGARE B. B.
Ambadas Kachru Weldode
Baburao Shankar Weldode
Trimbak Kachru Weldode
Raju Ashok Weldode
Ramdas Santu Gaikwad
Shankar Jayram Athwale
Bababai Omprakash Khandare
Shivji Dashrath Weldode
Indubai Dashrath Kamble
Sudhakar Shankar Gaikwad
Ashok Gopala Athawale
Vishwanath Gopala Athwale
Kamlakar Shaurao Gaikwad
Ramdas Bandu Gaikwad
Sakharam Vithoba Weldode
Bhika Vithoba Weldode
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Collector Advocate - MATE A D
Sub Divisional Officer
Tahasildar
Board Officer
Talathi
Mahadu Kaduba Satpute
Raosaheb Mahadu Satpute
Hearing History
Judge: 29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 75/2021 Court Order Outcome (dated 22.04.2024): The petition filed by Sukhdev Dashrath Weldode and others seeking to add petitioners 1-14 as plaintiffs 19-32 in a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Tandulwadi and Sisrsagav, Bhokrdan was dismissed. The court found that the two disputed properties (Ghat No. 103 and Ghat No. 177) are distinct and separate; petitioners had no connection to property 103, therefore they cannot claim relief based on the suit concerning that property and must pursue separate proceedings if claiming rights to property 177. Costs to be borne by respective parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 75/2021 Court Order Outcome (dated 22.04.2024): The petition filed by Sukhdev Dashrath Weldode and others seeking to add petitioners 1-14 as plaintiffs 19-32 in a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Tandulwadi and Sisrsagav, Bhokrdan was dismissed. The court found that the two disputed properties (Ghat No. 103 and Ghat No. 177) are distinct and separate; petitioners had no connection to property 103, therefore they cannot claim relief based on the suit concerning that property and must pursue separate proceedings if claiming rights to property 177. Costs to be borne by respective parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts