Punjabai Dagdu Ughade vs Pandit Dagdu Ughade Advocate - KHANDEKAR B.K. — 200121/2010
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Suitforpartitionandseperateposession,Suitfordeclaration,Suitforpermanentinjunction. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN020003132010
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
200114/2010
Filing Date
03-04-2010
Registration No
200121/2010
Registration Date
08-04-2010
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
33-Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Punjabai Dagdu Ughade
Adv. TANPURE N. D.
Babanbai Bhagwan Kharat
Chayabai Dilip Ratnaparkhe
Respondent(s)
Pandit Dagdu Ughade Advocate - KHANDEKAR B.K.
Virji Jesa Begdiya
Malharrao Vishvanath Potdar
Radhabai Balabhau Gawande
Arun Bansidhar Mane
Phulchand Anandrao Sirap
Pradip Sharadrao Patil
Vishwas Nagnathrao Bhore
Nandkishor Tukaram Gavane
Sk.Mustaq Sk Amir
Sk Asif Sk Amir
Prabhakar Dagdu Ughde
Hearing History
Judge: 33-Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 02-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 21-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary of R.C.S. No. 121/2010 The suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural property in Jalna was partially compromised through mediation. The case was disposed of against defendants 3, 4-A, 4-B, 8, 9, and 10 as per the settlement agreement. Plaintiffs were permitted to withdraw against these defendants. The suit continues against defendants 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 12 regarding partition, separate possession, and other reliefs claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of R.C.S. No. 121/2010 The suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural property in Jalna was partially compromised through mediation. The case was disposed of against defendants 3, 4-A, 4-B, 8, 9, and 10 as per the settlement agreement. Plaintiffs were permitted to withdraw against these defendants. The suit continues against defendants 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 12 regarding partition, separate possession, and other reliefs claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts