Kantabai Dnayneshwer LakkasRepresented by Guardian -Vedika Dnayneshwer Lakkas vs Deputy engineer / The Executive Engineer — 3/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O37. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN020000502020
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
51/2020
Filing Date
07-01-2020
Registration No
3/2020
Registration Date
08-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kantabai Dnayneshwer LakkasRepresented by Guardian -Vedika Dnayneshwer Lakkas
Adv. BURJE S. R.
Vedika Dnaynewhwer LakkasRepresented by Guardian - Kantabai Dnaynesher Lakkas
Tejal Dnayneshwer LakkasRepresented by Guardian - Kantabai Dnayneshwer Lakkas
Sarthak Dnayneshwer LakkasRepresented by Guardian - Kantabai Dnyneshwer Lakkas
Sahsikalabai Dadarao Lakkas
Dadarao Sampat Lakkas
Respondent(s)
Deputy engineer / The Executive Engineer
The Executive Engineer Public Road Construction Division
The Executive Engineer Public Road Construction
The State of Maharashtra Through Collector Office
Hearing History
Judge: 29-2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Kantabai & ors. Vs. State & ors. (3/2020) The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "no cross" order dated 04.10.2023. The plaintiff had filed fresh evidence after correcting the deceased's name in her affidavit, but defendants were absent. The court found it necessary to allow defendant government officers to participate in the trial on merit. Plaintiff No.1 must appear for cross-examination on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Kantabai & ors. Vs. State & ors. (3/2020) The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "no cross" order dated 04.10.2023. The plaintiff had filed fresh evidence after correcting the deceased's name in her affidavit, but defendants were absent. The court found it necessary to allow defendant government officers to participate in the trial on merit. Plaintiff No.1 must appear for cross-examination on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts