The State of Maharashtra vs Gauskha Sardar Kha Pathan (UTP) Advocate - SAYYAD MUJIB WAHAB — 292/2023
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHJN010036802023
Filing Number
2153/2023
Filing Date
21-Dec-2023
Registration No
292/2023
Registration Date
22-Dec-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
42-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
232
Police Station
Paradh
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. SOLANKE J B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gauskha Sardar Kha Pathan (UTP) Advocate - SAYYAD MUJIB WAHAB
-
2.Jaydabi Gouskha Sardarkha Pathan
Case History
-
20-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Jul-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
07-Jul-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
30-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
24-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
17-Jun-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gouskha Sardar Kha Pathan (2023) Outcome: Bail application rejected; trial expedited. The court denied the second bail application of accused Gouskha Sardar Kha Pathan in a cannabis possession case involving 2,301 kg of ganja plants worth Rs. 2,30,13,500. While the accused argued trial delay (only one witness examined since September 2023) and procedural defects, the court found prima-facie evidence of involvement in a serious NDPS offense. The court rejected claims of incomplete charge-sheet despite pending FSL report, and directed prosecution to expedite trial by ensuring witness presence at all scheduled dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
08-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
21-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
31-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
20-May-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence
-
10-Oct-2024
Evidence
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
-
02-Aug-2024
Charge
-
01-Aug-2024
Charge
-
31-Jul-2024
Charge
-
22-Jul-2024
Charge
-
11-Jul-2024
Charge
-
25-Jun-2024
Charge
-
11-Jun-2024
Charge
-
24-May-2024
Charge
-
08-May-2024
Charge
-
15-Apr-2024
Charge
-
06-Apr-2024
Charge
-
16-Mar-2024
Charge
-
02-Mar-2024
Charge
-
15-Feb-2024
Charge
-
02-Feb-2024
Charge
-
20-Jan-2024
Charge
-
06-Jan-2024
Order on Exhibit
-
06-Jan-2024
Charge
-
05-Jan-2024
Order on Exh
-
03-Jan-2024
Appearance
-
28-Dec-2023
Appearance
-
22-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 292/2023
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gouskha Sardar Kha Pathan (2023) Outcome: Bail application rejected; trial expedited. The court denied the second bail application of accused Gouskha Sardar Kha Pathan in a cannabis possession case involving 2,301 kg of ganja plants worth Rs. 2,30,13,500. While the accused argued trial delay (only one witness examined since September 2023) and procedural defects, the court found prima-facie evidence of involvement in a serious NDPS offense. The court rejected claims of incomplete charge-sheet despite pending FSL report, and directed prosecution to expedite trial by ensuring witness presence at all scheduled dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts