The State of Maharashtra vs Afroj Firoz Pathan Advocate - SAYED TARIQ M. — 237/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366A,376,376(2)(n),354. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 27-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHJN010031452023

Filing Number

1816/2023

Filing Date

18-Oct-2023

Registration No

237/2023

Registration Date

18-Oct-2023

Court

District and Session Court , Jalna

Judge

34-District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

649

Police Station

Sadar Bazar Jalna.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,366A,376,376(2)(n),354
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,5(L),8,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Afroj Firoz Pathan Advocate - SAYED TARIQ M.

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Jul-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  3. 04-Jul-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  6. 26-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 04-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  8. 23-Apr-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  9. 23-Apr-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  10. 23-Apr-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Afroj Firoz Pathan (237/2023) The Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna granted regular bail to accused Afroj Firoz Pathan on April 23, 2026, in a case involving serious charges under IPC sections 363, 366-A, 376, 376(2)(n), 354 and POCSO Act sections 4, 5(l), 6, 8, 12. The applicant had previously absconded after being released on pre-trial bail, resulting in a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW); his absence was attributed to a hospitalization following an accident. The court found the trial near conclusion with six prosecution witnesses examined, and considering the applicant's willingness to comply with bail conditions, granted release on furnishing Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance and surety, subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no witness intimidation, and no contact with the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  12. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  13. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  14. 11-Mar-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  15. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  16. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  19. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  20. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  21. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  22. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  23. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  24. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  25. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  26. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  27. 09-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  28. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  29. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  30. 16-Dec-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  31. 12-Nov-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  32. 14-Oct-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  33. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  34. 26-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  35. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  36. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  37. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  38. 03-May-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  39. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  40. 29-Feb-2024

    Charge

    Adhoc District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge

  41. 16-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge

  42. 18-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 18-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Afroj Firoz Pathan (237/2023) The Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna granted regular bail to accused Afroj Firoz Pathan on April 23, 2026, in a case involving serious charges under IPC sections 363, 366-A, 376, 376(2)(n), 354 and POCSO Act sections 4, 5(l), 6, 8, 12. The applicant had previously absconded after being released on pre-trial bail, resulting in a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW); his absence was attributed to a hospitalization following an accident. The court found the trial near conclusion with six prosecution witnesses examined, and considering the applicant's willingness to comply with bail conditions, granted release on furnishing Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance and surety, subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no witness intimidation, and no contact with the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case