The State of Maharashtra vs Abuzar Sandu Kha Pathan Advocate - CHATE S. M. — 262/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(H),70(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHJN010026172025

Filing Number

1560/2025

Filing Date

14-Oct-2025

Registration No

262/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Jalna

Judge

34-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

207

Police Station

Hasnabad

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(H),70(1)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 5(g)(q),6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. MUKIM L.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abuzar Sandu Kha Pathan Advocate - CHATE S. M.

  2. 2.Pathan Sahil Ismail

    Adv. CHATE S. M.

  3. 3.Pathan Sahil Amajat

    Adv. CHATE S. M.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Special Case No. 262/2025 Court Decision: All three accused were acquitted of charges under BNS sections 64(2)(h), 70(1) r/w 3(5) and POCSO Act section 5(g)(q). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the fundamental facts of the alleged gang rape and aggravated sexual assault against a pregnant minor victim, as both the victim and her father did not support the case in court testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  13. 30-Dec-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  14. 19-Dec-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  15. 08-Dec-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 15-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  19. 12-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  20. 10-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  21. 04-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  22. 01-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  23. 29-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  24. 28-Oct-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  25. 17-Oct-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  26. 16-Oct-2025

    Steps

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  27. 15-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 14-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 262/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Special Case No. 262/2025 Court Decision: All three accused were acquitted of charges under BNS sections 64(2)(h), 70(1) r/w 3(5) and POCSO Act section 5(g)(q). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the fundamental facts of the alleged gang rape and aggravated sexual assault against a pregnant minor victim, as both the victim and her father did not support the case in court testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case