The State of Maharashtra vs Abuzar Sandu Kha Pathan Advocate - CHATE S. M. — 262/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(H),70(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHJN010026172025
Filing Number
1560/2025
Filing Date
14-10-2025
Registration No
262/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
34-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
207
Police Station
Hasnabad
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. MUKIM L.P.
Respondent(s)
Abuzar Sandu Kha Pathan Advocate - CHATE S. M.
Pathan Sahil Ismail
Adv. CHATE S. M.
Pathan Sahil Amajat
Adv. CHATE S. M.
Hearing History
Judge: 34-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Special Case No. 262/2025 Court Decision: All three accused were acquitted of charges under BNS sections 64(2)(h), 70(1) r/w 3(5) and POCSO Act section 5(g)(q). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the fundamental facts of the alleged gang rape and aggravated sexual assault against a pregnant minor victim, as both the victim and her father did not support the case in court testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special Case No. 262/2025 Court Decision: All three accused were acquitted of charges under BNS sections 64(2)(h), 70(1) r/w 3(5) and POCSO Act section 5(g)(q). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the fundamental facts of the alleged gang rape and aggravated sexual assault against a pregnant minor victim, as both the victim and her father did not support the case in court testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts