Asaram Umaji Panjage vs Arjun Annasaheb Yeole — 178/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHJN010019622022

Filing Number

896/2022

Filing Date

24-Jun-2022

Registration No

178/2022

Registration Date

28-Jun-2022

Court

District and Session Court , Jalna

Judge

14-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Asaram Umaji Panjage

    Adv. PALLAVI KINGAONKAR

  2. 2.Janardhan Asaram Panjage

    Adv. PALLAVI KINGAONKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arjun Annasaheb Yeole

  2. 2.Cholamandlam M.S.G.I.C.Ltd.

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  10. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  11. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  13. 10-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  14. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  15. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  16. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  17. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  18. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  19. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  20. 12-Dec-2024

    Defence Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  21. 30-Nov-2024

    Defence Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  22. 14-Nov-2024

    Defence Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  23. 24-Oct-2024

    Defence Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  24. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  25. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  26. 26-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  27. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  28. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  29. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  30. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  31. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  32. 07-Mar-2024

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  33. 17-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  34. 15-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 178/2022 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the application (Exh.5) filed by Asaram Umaji Panjage and Janardhan Asaram Panjage seeking compensation for a death resulting from a motorcycle accident on 27.01.2022. The tribunal found that a prima facie case for NFL compensation was not established due to: (1) unexplained delay in lodging the FIR (27.01.2022 accident but FIR filed 07.03.2022); and (2) documentary inconsistencies—the involvement of another vehicle was not clearly established in the accident inquiry documents and the actual FIR was not placed on record. The tribunal held that whether another vehicle was involved remained in "shadow of doubt." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  35. 15-Jan-2024

    Issues

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  36. 16-Dec-2023

    Compliance

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  37. 31-Oct-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  38. 12-Sep-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  39. 21-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  40. 05-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

  41. 26-Jul-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  42. 12-Jul-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  43. 04-Jul-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  44. 06-Jun-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  45. 04-May-2023

    No Say Order

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  46. 19-Apr-2023

    No Say Order

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  47. 12-Apr-2023

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  48. 18-Mar-2023

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  49. 09-Feb-2023

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  50. 11-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  51. 07-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  52. 03-Dec-2022

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  53. 17-Nov-2022

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  54. 12-Oct-2022

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  55. 02-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  56. 06-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  57. 30-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  58. 28-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 24-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 178/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 178/2022 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the application (Exh.5) filed by Asaram Umaji Panjage and Janardhan Asaram Panjage seeking compensation for a death resulting from a motorcycle accident on 27.01.2022. The tribunal found that a prima facie case for NFL compensation was not established due to: (1) unexplained delay in lodging the FIR (27.01.2022 accident but FIR filed 07.03.2022); and (2) documentary inconsistencies—the involvement of another vehicle was not clearly established in the accident inquiry documents and the actual FIR was not placed on record. The tribunal held that whether another vehicle was involved remained in "shadow of doubt." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case