The State of Maharashtra vs Pratiksha Akash Shingare Advocate - LADC Chief Adv M R Waghunde — 109/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHJN010018842025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
18-06-2025
Filing Number
1105/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
109/2025
Registration Date
19-07-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
249
Police Station
Sadar Bazar Jalna.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. जिल्हा सरकारी वकील बी. व्ही. इंगळे
Respondent(s)
Pratiksha Akash Shingare Advocate - LADC Chief Adv M R Waghunde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 109/2025 Outcome: Bail application rejected. The court denied bail to the accused, Pratiksha Akash Shingare, charged with murder of her mother-in-law and evidence destruction under BNS sections 103(1) and 238. Despite being a first-time offender with no criminal history, the Sessions Judge found sufficient circumstantial evidence of complicity, including CCTV footage of a woman dragging a sack containing the deceased down stairs, blood-stained evidence in the locked house, and the fact that only the accused and deceased were residing there. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 109/2025 Outcome: Bail application rejected. The court denied bail to the accused, Pratiksha Akash Shingare, charged with murder of her mother-in-law and evidence destruction under BNS sections 103(1) and 238. Despite being a first-time offender with no criminal history, the Sessions Judge found sufficient circumstantial evidence of complicity, including CCTV footage of a woman dragging a sack containing the deceased down stairs, blood-stained evidence in the locked house, and the fact that only the accused and deceased were residing there. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts