The State of Maharashtra vs Pratiksha Akash Shingare Advocate - LADC Chief Adv M R Waghunde — 109/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHJN010018842025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

18-06-2025

Filing Number

1105/2025

Filing Date

17-07-2025

Registration No

109/2025

Registration Date

19-07-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Jalna

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

249

Police Station

Sadar Bazar Jalna.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. जिल्हा सरकारी वकील बी. व्ही. इंगळे

Respondent(s)

Pratiksha Akash Shingare Advocate - LADC Chief Adv M R Waghunde

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

05-06-2026

Evidence Part Heard

21-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

07-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

23-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

02-08-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 109/2025 Outcome: Bail application rejected. The court denied bail to the accused, Pratiksha Akash Shingare, charged with murder of her mother-in-law and evidence destruction under BNS sections 103(1) and 238. Despite being a first-time offender with no criminal history, the Sessions Judge found sufficient circumstantial evidence of complicity, including CCTV footage of a woman dragging a sack containing the deceased down stairs, blood-stained evidence in the locked house, and the fact that only the accused and deceased were residing there. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 109/2025 Outcome: Bail application rejected. The court denied bail to the accused, Pratiksha Akash Shingare, charged with murder of her mother-in-law and evidence destruction under BNS sections 103(1) and 238. Despite being a first-time offender with no criminal history, the Sessions Judge found sufficient circumstantial evidence of complicity, including CCTV footage of a woman dragging a sack containing the deceased down stairs, blood-stained evidence in the locked house, and the fact that only the accused and deceased were residing there. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Jalna All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case