The State of Maharashtra vs Balaji Bhagwan Pawar Advocate - KALE S N — 180/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,146,149,353,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHJN010018032023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-05-2023

Filing Number

963/2023

Filing Date

29-05-2023

Registration No

180/2023

Registration Date

29-05-2023

Court

District and Session Court , Jalna

Judge

30-Adhoc District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

462

Police Station

Taluka Jalna

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 143,146,149,353,506

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. SONAWANE A. B.

Respondent(s)

Balaji Bhagwan Pawar Advocate - KALE S N

Somnath Laxman Jadhav

Tukaram Malhari Vitekar

Pradip Vidyadhar Waghmare

Shankar Baburao Pawar

Vishnu Vitthalrao Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 30-Adhoc District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge

24-04-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

Judgment

16-04-2026

Judgment

08-04-2026

Arguments

30-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

24-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Session Case 180/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused (Balaji Bhagwan Pawar, Somnath Laxman Jadhav, Tukaram Malhari Vitekar, Pradip Vidyadhar Vagmare, Shankar Baburav Pawar, and Vishnu Vitthol Pawar) under IPC sections 353, 143, 146, 149, 506 and Mining Mineral Act sections 48/7 and 48/8. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and gaps in witness testimony. Key Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses had contradictory statements regarding the incident location, sequence of events, and identification of accused persons. Critical evidence like vehicles allegedly seized remained unaccounted for in the case record, and no solid documentary proof directly linked the accused to the alleged rioting, obstruction of government duty, or illegal mining activities on October 13, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Session Case 180/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused (Balaji Bhagwan Pawar, Somnath Laxman Jadhav, Tukaram Malhari Vitekar, Pradip Vidyadhar Vagmare, Shankar Baburav Pawar, and Vishnu Vitthol Pawar) under IPC sections 353, 143, 146, 149, 506 and Mining Mineral Act sections 48/7 and 48/8. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and gaps in witness testimony. Key Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses had contradictory statements regarding the incident location, sequence of events, and identification of accused persons. Critical evidence like vehicles allegedly seized remained unaccounted for in the case record, and no solid documentary proof directly linked the accused to the alleged rioting, obstruction of government duty, or illegal mining activities on October 13, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Jalna All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case