The State of Maharashtra vs Balaji Bhagwan Pawar Advocate - KALE S N — 180/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,146,149,353,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHJN010018032023
e-Filing Number
29-05-2023
Filing Number
963/2023
Filing Date
29-05-2023
Registration No
180/2023
Registration Date
29-05-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
30-Adhoc District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
462
Police Station
Taluka Jalna
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. SONAWANE A. B.
Respondent(s)
Balaji Bhagwan Pawar Advocate - KALE S N
Somnath Laxman Jadhav
Tukaram Malhari Vitekar
Pradip Vidyadhar Waghmare
Shankar Baburao Pawar
Vishnu Vitthalrao Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 30-Adhoc District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Session Case 180/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused (Balaji Bhagwan Pawar, Somnath Laxman Jadhav, Tukaram Malhari Vitekar, Pradip Vidyadhar Vagmare, Shankar Baburav Pawar, and Vishnu Vitthol Pawar) under IPC sections 353, 143, 146, 149, 506 and Mining Mineral Act sections 48/7 and 48/8. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and gaps in witness testimony. Key Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses had contradictory statements regarding the incident location, sequence of events, and identification of accused persons. Critical evidence like vehicles allegedly seized remained unaccounted for in the case record, and no solid documentary proof directly linked the accused to the alleged rioting, obstruction of government duty, or illegal mining activities on October 13, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Session Case 180/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused (Balaji Bhagwan Pawar, Somnath Laxman Jadhav, Tukaram Malhari Vitekar, Pradip Vidyadhar Vagmare, Shankar Baburav Pawar, and Vishnu Vitthol Pawar) under IPC sections 353, 143, 146, 149, 506 and Mining Mineral Act sections 48/7 and 48/8. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and gaps in witness testimony. Key Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses had contradictory statements regarding the incident location, sequence of events, and identification of accused persons. Critical evidence like vehicles allegedly seized remained unaccounted for in the case record, and no solid documentary proof directly linked the accused to the alleged rioting, obstruction of government duty, or illegal mining activities on October 13, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts