The State of Maharashtra vs Mahadu Udal Maher @ Madhav Udalsing Maher Advocate - CHATE S. M. — 91/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354A,354D,376(2)(N)(I),341,452,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHJN010013672023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
666/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2023
Registration No
91/2023
Registration Date
13-04-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
34-District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
Paradh
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. MUKIM L.P.
Respondent(s)
Mahadu Udal Maher @ Madhav Udalsing Maher Advocate - CHATE S. M.
Karan Devsing Nimrot
Adv. JANJAL D M
Pawan Punam Chanda
Adv. MURME A.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 34-District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 14-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Special Case No. 91/2023 Bail Application REJECTED. The accused's bail application in a sexual assault case involving a 15-year-old victim was dismissed. The court found the charges under IPC Sections 376(2)(i)-(n) and POCSO Act Section 6 are serious with stringent punishment, medical evidence supports the FIR, and the accused being a relative poses risk of witness intimidation given shared village residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special Case No. 91/2023 Bail Application REJECTED. The accused's bail application in a sexual assault case involving a 15-year-old victim was dismissed. The court found the charges under IPC Sections 376(2)(i)-(n) and POCSO Act Section 6 are serious with stringent punishment, medical evidence supports the FIR, and the accused being a relative poses risk of witness intimidation given shared village residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts