Dnyaneshwar Bhimrao Ghodke vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 443/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th June 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHJN010012162026
e-Filing Number
26-05-2026
Filing Number
784/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
443/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
14-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
157
Police Station
Jafrabad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dnyaneshwar Bhimrao Ghodke
Adv. AMBHORE RAMESHWAR SHIVAJIRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Order on Exhibit
The Additional Sessions Judge-2, Jalna granted bail to Dnyaneshwar Bhimrao Ghodke in a case involving alleged assault, property damage, and threats against his brother's wife over a land dispute. The court found that while the accused had been in judicial custody since May 21, 2026, no specific role was attributed to him and no recoveries were made, making further custodial interrogation unnecessary. The accused was released on a Rs. 15,000 personal recognizance bond with a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, remaining within Jalna district jurisdiction, and furnishing identification details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
08-Jun-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
30-May-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 443/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge-2, Jalna granted bail to Dnyaneshwar Bhimrao Ghodke in a case involving alleged assault, property damage, and threats against his brother's wife over a land dispute. The court found that while the accused had been in judicial custody since May 21, 2026, no specific role was attributed to him and no recoveries were made, making further custodial interrogation unnecessary. The accused was released on a Rs. 15,000 personal recognizance bond with a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, remaining within Jalna district jurisdiction, and furnishing identification details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts