Akash Dwarkadas Rathod vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 441/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 30th May 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHJN010012142026
e-Filing Number
26-05-2026
Filing Number
782/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
441/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
34-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
377
Police Station
Mantha
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Akash Dwarkadas Rathod
Adv. Rathod Usha Dharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
Order on Exhibit
The Additional Sessions Judge at Jalna granted bail to Akash Dwarkadas Rathod, accused of assisting in the kidnapping of a 13-year-old girl under IPC and POCSO Act sections. The court found that the applicant's role was peripheral—merely accompanying the main juvenile offender—and that his name emerged only in supplementary victim statements, warranting release on regular bail with Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance and surety, subject to weekly police reporting and conditions prohibiting victim contact and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
29-May-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
28-May-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 441/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge at Jalna granted bail to Akash Dwarkadas Rathod, accused of assisting in the kidnapping of a 13-year-old girl under IPC and POCSO Act sections. The court found that the applicant's role was peripheral—merely accompanying the main juvenile offender—and that his name emerged only in supplementary victim statements, warranting release on regular bail with Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance and surety, subject to weekly police reporting and conditions prohibiting victim contact and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts