The State of Maharashtra vs Sachin Devidas Sonvane Advocate - JANJAL D M — 115/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(m),64(2)(f),75,351(3). Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Awaiting Muddemal Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHJN010011992025

Filing Number

695/2025

Filing Date

30-Apr-2025

Registration No

115/2025

Registration Date

02-May-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Jalna

Judge

34-District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

Badnapur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(m),64(2)(f),75,351(3)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6
Information Technology Act Section 67

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Smt.MUKIM V.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Devidas Sonvane Advocate - JANJAL D M

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jul-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-4 and Addl.Sessions Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  15. 01-Oct-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  16. 08-Aug-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 19-Jun-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 21-May-2025

    Order on Exhibit

    Case 115/2025 Summary Sachin Devidas Sonawane's bail application was ALLOWED. The 25-year-old accused, charged with sexual abuse of a 17-year-old victim under POCSO Act and IT Act provisions, was granted bail on Rs. 50,000 security with stringent conditions including: no contact with victim, non-tampering with witnesses, not circulating victim's photographs, remaining outside District Jalna except court dates, and court attendance. The judge found prima facie evidence insufficient for forcible abuse, noting possible consensuality and the 20-day complaint delay as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 21-May-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  20. 20-May-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  21. 19-May-2025

    Reply/Say

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  22. 17-May-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  23. 05-May-2025

    Hearing Before Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  24. 02-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 30-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 115/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 115/2025 Summary Sachin Devidas Sonawane's bail application was ALLOWED. The 25-year-old accused, charged with sexual abuse of a 17-year-old victim under POCSO Act and IT Act provisions, was granted bail on Rs. 50,000 security with stringent conditions including: no contact with victim, non-tampering with witnesses, not circulating victim's photographs, remaining outside District Jalna except court dates, and court attendance. The judge found prima facie evidence insufficient for forcible abuse, noting possible consensuality and the 20-day complaint delay as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case