Salim Kalu Qureshi vs The State of Maharashtra — 405/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th June 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHJN010011612026
e-Filing Number
18-05-2026
Filing Number
730/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
405/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
14-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
126
Police Station
Paradh
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Salim Kalu Qureshi
Adv. SAYYAD MUJIB WAHAB
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: Salim Kalu Qureshi v. State of Maharashtra (405/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Salim Kalu Qureshi, accused of assaulting an informant with co-accused using wooden sticks and iron rods. The court found no specific role attributed to the applicant, weapons already seized from co-accused, only simple injuries sustained, and no custodial interrogation necessary. Bail was granted on Rs.15,000 personal and surety bonds with strict conditions including monthly police reporting, non-contact with witnesses, and prohibition on evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
08-Jun-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
30-May-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 405/2026
Case Summary: Salim Kalu Qureshi v. State of Maharashtra (405/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Salim Kalu Qureshi, accused of assaulting an informant with co-accused using wooden sticks and iron rods. The court found no specific role attributed to the applicant, weapons already seized from co-accused, only simple injuries sustained, and no custodial interrogation necessary. Bail was granted on Rs.15,000 personal and surety bonds with strict conditions including monthly police reporting, non-contact with witnesses, and prohibition on evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts