Shyam Vyankatrao Bidwe vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 204/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHJN010006752026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

385/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

204/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Jalna

Judge

14-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

Ashti

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2),351(2),352,115(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shyam Vyankatrao Bidwe

    Adv. Deepak manohar dahale

  2. 2.Vyankatrao Umaji Bidwe

    Adv. Deepak manohar dahale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 204 of 2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to both accused (Sham s/o Vyankatrao Bidwe and Vyankatrao s/o Umaji Bidwe), finding that recovery was completed, investigation was nearly finished, and no further custodial interrogation was required. The court imposed stringent conditions including ₹20,000 personal recognizance bonds each, restrictions on witness/evidence tampering, and confinement to District Jalna jurisdiction. Case Facts: The accused were charged with dowry harassment and cruelty following the death of the accused's wife, who allegedly consumed pesticide after being ill-treated and subjected to a ₹1 lakh dowry demand while pregnant. The prosecution opposed bail citing seriousness of offenses and witness tampering fears, but the court found these concerns manageable through bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 204/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 204 of 2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to both accused (Sham s/o Vyankatrao Bidwe and Vyankatrao s/o Umaji Bidwe), finding that recovery was completed, investigation was nearly finished, and no further custodial interrogation was required. The court imposed stringent conditions including ₹20,000 personal recognizance bonds each, restrictions on witness/evidence tampering, and confinement to District Jalna jurisdiction. Case Facts: The accused were charged with dowry harassment and cruelty following the death of the accused's wife, who allegedly consumed pesticide after being ill-treated and subjected to a ₹1 lakh dowry demand while pregnant. The prosecution opposed bail citing seriousness of offenses and witness tampering fears, but the court found these concerns manageable through bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case