The State of Maharashtra vs Sainath Arjun Hiwale — 33/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),191(2),191(3),190,109,118(1),352,351(2),324(4)(5),308(6). Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHJN010005312025
Next Hearing
03rd August 2026
Filing Number
284/2025
Filing Date
20-02-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
24-02-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
461
Police Station
Chandanzira
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sainath Arjun Hiwale
Pappu Kachru Ghorpade
Shubham Santosh Kolhe
Rahul Digambar Hiwale
Pawan Shankar Pullelu
Nandu Ashok Bhanuse
Balwansing Shyamsing Kalani
Kiran Bhosle
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 19-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 28-10-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 08-09-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case 33/2025 Summary: The court allowed accused Balwansingh Shyamsingh Kalani's application for interim custody of a seized TVS Rider motorcycle (MH21-BY-5617). The vehicle was seized in connection with an armed assault case. The court granted custody on conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 indemnity bond, vehicle documentation through photographs and panchnama, and prohibition against transferring or altering the motorcycle. The applicant must produce the vehicle as required by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 33/2025 Summary: The court allowed accused Balwansingh Shyamsingh Kalani's application for interim custody of a seized TVS Rider motorcycle (MH21-BY-5617). The vehicle was seized in connection with an armed assault case. The court granted custody on conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 indemnity bond, vehicle documentation through photographs and panchnama, and prohibition against transferring or altering the motorcycle. The applicant must produce the vehicle as required by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts