Anwar Daud Shaikh vs The State of Maharashtra — 130/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHJN010004662026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
253/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
130/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
14-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
399
Police Station
Gondi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anwar Daud Shaikh
Adv. KHAN K. A.
-
2.Shahanawaj Anwar Shaikh
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Anwar Daud Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra (2026) The court granted bail to both applicants in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty, assault, and violations of the Disabilities Act. The judge found that investigation was nearly complete with no recoveries requiring custodial interrogation, and that stringent bail conditions could adequately address witness-tampering concerns. Both accused were released on Rs. 15,000 personal and surety bonds each, with conditions including monthly police station reporting, no contact with victims/witnesses, no evidence tampering, and no witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 130/2026
Case Summary: Anwar Daud Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra (2026) The court granted bail to both applicants in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty, assault, and violations of the Disabilities Act. The judge found that investigation was nearly complete with no recoveries requiring custodial interrogation, and that stringent bail conditions could adequately address witness-tampering concerns. Both accused were released on Rs. 15,000 personal and surety bonds each, with conditions including monthly police station reporting, no contact with victims/witnesses, no evidence tampering, and no witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts