Santosh Mahadev Khandekar vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 4/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested-- on 07th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN010001372026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
14-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Jalna
Judge
14-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
440
Police Station
Kadim Jalna
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Santosh Mahadev Khandekar
Adv. BHANDE ANAND RAJENDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Santosh Mahadev Khandekar v. State of Maharashtra (CMA 4/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the accused's application for conditional interim custody of seized assets. During an Anti-Corruption Bureau raid under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7, police seized Rs.5,19,500 in cash, a Samsung Galaxy Z Fold mobile phone, and a Dell laptop from the applicant's residence. The court granted interim custody of these items upon execution of indemnity bonds (Rs.5,19,500 for cash, Rs.50,000 for mobile, Rs.1,00,000 for laptop) and furnishing two solvent sureties, relying on established precedents permitting such relief where valuable property has no investigative utility remaining in police custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
02-May-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Documents
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Documents
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Documents
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Documents
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Documents
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Case Summary: Santosh Mahadev Khandekar v. State of Maharashtra (CMA 4/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the accused's application for conditional interim custody of seized assets. During an Anti-Corruption Bureau raid under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7, police seized Rs.5,19,500 in cash, a Samsung Galaxy Z Fold mobile phone, and a Dell laptop from the applicant's residence. The court granted interim custody of these items upon execution of indemnity bonds (Rs.5,19,500 for cash, Rs.50,000 for mobile, Rs.1,00,000 for laptop) and furnishing two solvent sureties, relying on established precedents permitting such relief where valuable property has no investigative utility remaining in police custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts