Madhukar Chintaman Pavle vs Arun Nimba Pavle — 117/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section Sec38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Aug-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJG220009942024

e-Filing Number

27-06-2024

Filing Number

777/2024

Filing Date

28-Jun-2024

Registration No

117/2024

Registration Date

29-Jun-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT SENIOR DIVISON, CHALISGAON

Judge

5-4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section Sec38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Madhukar Chintaman Pavle

    Adv. BONDARDE PRASHANT DEVIDAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arun Nimba Pavle

Case History

  1. 04-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    4th Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  11. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  13. 09-Apr-2025

    Issues

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  14. 24-Jan-2025

    Issues

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  15. 18-Dec-2024

    Issues

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  16. 18-Oct-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary The court granted the plaintiff's interim injunction petition (Injunction No. 6) under CPC Order 39, Sections 1 & 2. The court ordered that the defendant must not obstruct or interfere with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the disputed agricultural property (land plots in Taravade, Chalisgaon). The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with balance of convenience in his favor, and that irreparable harm would result if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 18-Oct-2024

    Issues

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  18. 14-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  19. 09-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  20. 30-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  21. 19-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  22. 17-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  23. 29-Jul-2024

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC, Chalisgaon

  24. 29-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 28-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the plaintiff's interim injunction petition (Injunction No. 6) under CPC Order 39, Sections 1 & 2. The court ordered that the defendant must not obstruct or interfere with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the disputed agricultural property (land plots in Taravade, Chalisgaon). The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with balance of convenience in his favor, and that irreparable harm would result if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case